Missy's Hope Equine Rescue Resource 

Home

 

General Information:

About Us

Contact Us

Mission and Policy Information

In Memory

Guestbook

 

Our Programs:

The Chey/Annie Project

The Chey/Annie Project Fundraisers

The Chey/Annie Project Accounting

The Chey/Annie Project Future Sling Locations

Current Sling Locations

 

Rescue Information:

Rescues In Need

Rescues In Need 2

Rescue Fundraisers

Rescue Links

Rescue Links 2

International Rescue Links

Horse and Rescue Updates

Rescue Warnings

 

Resources:

Horse Auctions

>Auction Reports

Rescue Resources

Horse Owner Help Resource

Searching For Information

Horses Wanted

Available Hay

Emergency Help Information

Equine Services

International Equine Services

Equine Events

Pet Food and Product Warnings and Recalls

 

Congressional Information:

Congressional Information

Wild Horse Information

Wild Horse Information 2

Wild Horse Information 3

Letter Writing Campaigns For Horses

Horse Related Petitions

There Is A Viable Alternative To Equine Slaughter

Horse Slaughter Information

Horse Slaughter Information 2

Horse Slaughter Information 3

Horse Slaughter Information 4

 

Horse Health Information:

Cushings/Insulin Resistance Information

Helping Your Horse Prepare For Being Blind

Articles Relating To Equine Blindness

Horse Health Alerts

 

Miscellaneous:

PMU Information

Other Items

>NAIS Information

>Helpful Articles

>Miscellaneous Information

>Horse Rescue Poetry

Nurse Mare Foals

Favorite Yahoo Groups

State Level Laws 2

This is a list of new state laws pertaining to animals in general.  This includes laws that people are trying to get removed or are trying to get added as well as laws that have been recently passed.

 
New York:

Animal Abuser Registry Bill Passed in Albany County, NY

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:39 pm (PDT)
Animal Abuser Registry Bill Passed in Albany County, NY
by: Pat Raia
October 13 2011, Article # 18958
A bill that would create a database registry for animal cruelty offenders convicted in Albany County, N.Y. took a step toward becoming law on Tuesday (Oct. 11) when county lawmakers unanimously passed it. The measure establishes the second county animal offender registry in New York State. In 2010, Suffolk County lawmakers voted to establish a animal abuse offender registry there.
Introduced in September by County Legislator Bryan Clenahan, Local Law "K" requires those convicted of animal cruelty in Albany County to submit their names, addresses, and a photograph to the Albany County Sheriff's Office for inclusion in a county-wide database. Inclusion fees paid by offenders would cover database operation and maintenance costs. The Mohawk and Hudson Humane Society would maintain the database. Offenders who fail to provide information for the database would face penalties including fines.
In addition, breeders, animal shelters, and pet stores operating in the county be required to consult the database before selling an animal or placing an animal into an adoptive home. Under the measure, anyone who sells or places an adopted animal with a registered animal cruelty offender could also face penalties.
Clenahan said that on Oct. 11, members of the Albany County Legislature passed the unanimously measure. The bill now moves on to for approval by County Executive Michael G. Breslin before becoming law.
Mohawk and Hudson Humane Society Executive Director Brad Shear said the measure will ensure that animal welfare organizations operating in the county do not inadvertently place animals with convicted abusers. He would like to see registry requirements expand beyond Albany County.
"In fact, our hope is to see (registration legislation) go statewide," Shear said.
Clenahan said some other New York counties have expressed interest in establishing animal offender registries of their own.
"Albany County Executive Breslin has 10 days to sign the bill. The bill goes into affect 90 days after Breslin's signature.

 

Horse Slaughter Legislation

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:30 pm (PDT)
New York
Support: A03504
a.. Introduced by Assemblymember Deborah Glick, 1.25.11.
b.. Referred to the Agriculture Committee.
c.. Bill Summary: Prohibits the slaughter and transport of horses to slaughter for human consumption.
Action to Take - New York residents only please.
Contact your State Assemblymember stating you are strongly opposed to horse slaughter. It is your wish that they support and vote yes for A03504, using their full power and authority to see that this bill is moved out of Cmte to the floor for a vote, passed and enacted into law. A03504 currently resides in the Agriculture Committee.
Campaign Start Date: February 15, 2011
Status: Active
Marge
"You can't be liberated in your thinking if you're conservative in your approach."

 

NY Law to stop the slaughter of horses.  http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld&bn=A03504%09%09&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y

 

New York Legislators Pass Animal Abuser Registry Law

http://www.thehorse.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=17101

 

Animal Legislative issues NEW YORK:

Activists argue for harsher penalties for animal abusers

Posted: Feb 15, 2010 10:01 PM

Updated: Feb 15, 2010 10:01 PM

TROY, N.Y. -- Activists are renewing their cry for tougher penalties in animal abuse cases. The group is gaining steam from owners of victims, a local lawmaker, and News10's Steve Caporizzo.

Champions of Buster's Law met at Hudson Valley Community College Monday, ten years after the law was first signed, to discuss harsher penalties for animal abusers. Advocates say we've come a long way, but that the law doesn't go far enough to protect animals and humans.

"Those who commit abuse and cruelty to animals are just a step away from doing the same to humans," said Donna Reynolds, an animal law student at HVCC.

Students, activists, and Assemblyman James Tedisco say the need to expand Buster's Law is long overdue.

"Son of Sam, Ted Bundy, Dahmer, all the serial murderers had a history of abusing animals and the FBI shows it's a part of the profile," Tedisco said.

Buster's Law made the killing of a companion animal a felony in 1999. The owner of the Schenectady cat tortured by fire says Buster did not die in vain.

"Buster survived three weeks, and I think it was so everyone could hear that cry," Buster's owner, Nancy Bonesteel, said.

But not all animals are included in the law. Dawn Feathers showed the crowd gruesome photos of the murder of her horse, Skye. Most of the killer's jail time, however, came from a burglary charge.

"She had seven or eight stab wounds on the left side that went all over the place," Feather said.

This group wants to see more jail time than the two years allowed under Buster's Law. They also want the law to include all animals, to bar offenders from owning any pets and force them to undergo psychological evaluations.

"I think it's frustrating for anybody that's an animal lover to see so many stories in the news over the past few years, and you don't see the prosecution, you don't see the penalties being as strict as they should be for the crime that's committed on a beautiful animal," said Steve Caporizzo, News10's chief meteorologist who is active in addressing animal rights issues.

Assemblyman Tedisco is urging supporters to start petitions and send letters to lawmakers. He's even asking for input on specific language to include in a new bill.

Buster's Law languished for about ten years before it actually became law. People in Troy Monday night hoped their grassroots efforts will speed up some of those changes. 

Buster's Law Meeting Update:

Thank you to Assemblyman Jim Tedisco, Val Lang, Nancy Bonesteel, Dawn Feathers, Steve Caporizzo and many others for speaking out last night on behalf of the animals.

Last nights meeting was a great step forward in strengthening the animal cruelty law in our state. Like Assemblyman Tedisco said, the next step begins with the petitions and letters he will be starting for us to continue, as well as Tedisco did talk about the need for us to show up at offenders animal cruelty charges court hearings, (there will be one in Schenectady soon, for the guy who tortured his wifes dogs). I would like to expand the email list that I have re: advocating and getting this next step pushed thru.  I have always advocated for the protection of cruelty against animals and further became involved when my son and I witnessed a man strangle a cat and try to kill the other one,(Nov. 21, 2003- Issac Oliver case-Schenectady NY) and we testified at trial, and the memories of the senseless horrific brutal murder we witnessed are still very painful....Animals feel pain....they need our voice....we need to now get Skyes Law passed for that horse suffered  and we need to take the next step as discussed in last nights meeting.  Please crosspost this email and if I left out anyone's email, I apologize. just have them add it, and if your name is on this email list and you do want it on this list, also please let me know and I will remove it.  I am hoping that we, as a group can start that next crucial step as discussed in last nights meeting. Below are the links to the news coverage. Thank you for all that you do to help the animals.

Sincerely

Julie Tanner

http://www.troyrecord.com/articles/2010/02/16/news/doc4b7a34ab5d94d278708026.txt

http://www.wten.com/Global/story.asp?S=11989498

http://www.fox23news.com/news/local/story/Strengthening-Busters-Law/klKaVwjufEKqGDWLYvdBYA.cspx

http://capitalnews9.com/capital-region-news-12-content/top_stories/496285/tedisco-pushing-for-stronger-animal-cruelty-laws

 

 

 Update:

Skye's Amendment progress

Rec'd from Valerie-

Robin

I saw Jim Tedisco Wednesday night and he is very grateful for the amount of work you have put in on getting Skye's Amendment passed.
I am told that the petitions can keep coming in, there is no hard and fast deadline.
We have thousands of signatures and this is the kind of momentum that got Buster's Law signed in 1998.
So thank you again, and if you can, keep it going.  Here is the link for more info.
https://www.hvcc.edu/deptweb-animaloutreach/alerts.html
And spread the word!
val
==
Valerie A. Lang, J.D., M.L.S.
Assistant Professor
Hudson Valley Community College
80 Vandenburgh Avenue
Troy, NY  12180
518.629.7319 (V)
518.629.7509 (F)
http://animaloutreach.hvcc.edu/

forwarded by:

Robin J. Yager,  Director
Network Partners for Animals*
* We do not sanction any groups' ethics or actions and offer the Network Partners Group as a networking resource tool.

http://www.partnershelpinganimalscoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com  (remove spacing)
Spring Farm CARES
3364 Route 12
Clinton, NY 13323
315-790-1404

http://www.springfarmcares.org (no spaces)

Life is as dear to the mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants
happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not to die, so
do other creatures. ~ His Holiness The Dalai Lama

 

NYS - Proposed Amendment to Ag Law - S6284/A6047

Posted by: "minesafety" MineSafety@aol.com   minesafety

Wed Feb 3, 2010 2:13 pm (PST)
New Yorkers on this list:
Here is the bill language that would amend the Agriculture and Markets Law to make intentional cruelty to ANY animal a felony versus a misdemeanor charge. Please write to your representative in NYS with Skye's story and ask him or her to support this bill!
-- Ellen Smith
The bill numbers are: S6284 (Senate) and A6047 (Assembly)
---
S6284 Summary
Provides that a person is guilty of aggravated cruelty to animals when such person intentionally kills or causes serious physical injury to an animal with aggravated cruelty; removes qualification that animal need be a companion animal.
Act: AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to aggravated cruelty to animals
S6284 Actions
"Same as" Actions for Bill A6047
Feb 24, 2009 referred to agriculture
S6284 Memo
BILL NUMBER: S6284
TITLE OF BILL :
An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to
aggravated cruelty to animals
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL :
This legislation provides that a person is guilty of aggravated
cruelty to animals when he or she intentionally kills or causes
serious physical injury to an animal with aggravated cruelty.
SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS :
Amends Section 353-a of the agriculture and markets law by removing
the word companion from the section.
JUSTIFICATION :
Currently New York State Law only allows for felony charges to be
brought against individuals who commit aggravated cruelty to companion
animals, such as dogs and cats, all other animals are exempt from this
felony provision. Extremely depraved conduct to other types of animals
has occurred across the state, however because the existing law only
applies to companion animals, the individuals committing these crimes
can only be charged with a misdemeanor. This act would help to stop
the increased violence and maltreatment of animals by expanding the
aggravated cruelty statute to include all animals.
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :
New Bill.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :
None.
EFFECTIVE DATE :
This act shall take effect the 90th day after it shall have become
law.
S6284 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
--
6284
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
November 12, 2009
--
Introduced by Sen. ADAMS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to aggra-
vated cruelty to animals
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1 Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 353-a of the agriculture and
2 markets law, as added by chapter 118 of the laws of 1999, is amended to
3 read as follows:
4 1. A person is guilty of aggravated cruelty to animals when, with no
5 justifiable purpose, he or she intentionally kills or intentionally
6 causes serious physical injury to [a companion] AN animal with aggra-
7 vated cruelty. For purposes of this section, "aggravated cruelty" shall
8 mean conduct which: (i) is intended to cause extreme physical pain; or
9 (ii) is done or carried out in an especially depraved or sadistic
10 manner.
11 S 2. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
12 have become a law.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06373-01-9

 

http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/national-news/2009/November/27/NY-officials-hope-strengthen-abuse-laws-in-wake-of-Paragallo-arrest.aspx
Posted: Friday, November 27, 2009 2:42 PM
N.Y. officials hope to strengthen abuse laws in light of Paragallo arrest
by Paul Post
Officials monitoring Ernest Paragallo’s Center Brook Farm, where 177
starved, diseased Thoroughbreds were discovered last April, are working
with New York lawmakers to make sure such incidents are subject to more
stringent penalties.
On August 6, Paragallo was indicted on 35 counts of misdemeanor cruelty
to animals. He remains free on $5,000 bail facing up to $35,000 in
fines—$1,000 for each offense—and two years in jail, the maximum penalty
allowable under law. A trial, barring an unexpected settlement, is
expected to start next spring in Greene County Court.
Under current state law, equine abuse may only be treated as a
misdemeanor while cruelty to domestic pets such as cats and dogs is
considered a felony.
Paragallo is subject to the law at the time of his alleged offenses, but
officials hope to prevent similar situations in the future by upgrading
similar crimes to felony status.
“We’ve met with [New York State Senator Eric Adams (D-Brooklyn) who
chares the Senate’s Racing and Wagering Committee] to get these laws
toughened,” said Ron Perez of the Columbia-Greene Humane Society, which
is responsible for oversight at Paragallo’s farm in Climax, New York.
Republican Senator Roy J. McDonald and Assemblyman Tony Jordan, both of
whom represent Saratoga County, have called for similar action.
Perez said that he and Jerry Bilinski, D.V.M., last visited Paragallo’s
farm in mid-October, where the 60-plus remaining horses are all in good
shape. “There’s four workers there now,” he said. “With this many horses
things are a lot more manageable. They’re getting all the hay and feed
they need.”
Nursing horses back to health has cost the humane society more than
$80,000 in feed, medical supplies and veterinary expense. Much of the
tab has been paid for through donations. New York Racing Association
donated a considerable sum.
Perez said he hopes prosecutors will seek the maximum punishment
allowable, including fines. “We’ll be seeking restitution,” he said.
Paul Post is a New York-based correspondent for Thoroughbred Times

forwarded by:

Robin J. Yager,  Director
Network Partners for Animals*
* We do not sanction any groups' ethics or actions and offer the Network Partners Group as a networking resource tool.

http://www.partnershelpinganimalscoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com  (remove spacing)
Spring Farm CARES
3364 Route 12
Clinton, NY 13323
315-790-1404

http://www.springfarmcares.org (no spaces)

Life is as dear to the mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants
happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not to die, so
do other creatures. ~ His Holiness The Dalai Lama

 

http://wnyt. com/article/ stories/S1221486 .shtml?cat= 10112
Posted at: 10/29/2009 4:04 PM
Updated at: 10/29/2009 5:18 PM
By: WNYT Staff
Horse Slaughter Legislation Tracker
Federal
U.S. House of Representatives (H.R. 503)
Track the bill <http://www.house. gov/>
* Rep. Scott Murphy (D-New York, 20th Dist): Not a co-sponsor.
Murphy's office tells NewsChannel 13, "While no final bill has
come to the floor, Congressman Murphy feels that it would be
unfair to place further burdens on our horse owners, who are
finding it more and more expensive to care for their animals
during these tough economic times. As a result, some owners are
forced to cut feed, veterinary services and even abandon their
horses. Unwanted horses are often neglected and abused by owners
who lack the finical resources to care for them."
* Rep. Paul Tonko (D- New York, 21st Dist): Not a co-sponsor.
According to his office, Tonko supports the bill and has been a
longtime supporter of animal rights.
* Rep. John Conyers Sponsor H.R. 503: NewsChannel 13 contacted
Conyers' office to ask whey the bill has seen no action since
March. We were told they would get back to us but so far have
not.
U.S. Senate (S. 727)
Track the bill <http://www.senate. gov/>
* Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D- New York): Co-sponsor. On
October 22, 2009 her office told NewsChannel 13 there was a
secret hold placed on the legislation in the Senate. We did some
research and found secret holds are no longer allowed. A law
which was passed and signed in 2007 requires any senator placing
a hold on legislation to name themselves within 6 days.
* Sen. Charles Schumer (D- New York): Co-sponsor. On October
22, 2009, Schumer spoke with NewsChannel 13 via satellite. He
strongly supports this legislation. When asked why it's being
held up, he said they are trying to get unanimous consent to
avoid filibuster and they are three votes away. We asked about a
hold being placed on the legislation. He said it was a Democrat,
but they didn't yet have the name of the lawmaker. He said they
will soon because law requires them to give their name within six
days.
* Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-Louisiana) : Sponsor. October 23, 2009
Landrieu's office told NewsChannel 13 they have been trying to
work with the Judiciary Committee to get the bill out of
Committee before the end of the year. They asked for a hotline,
which is a notice of intent to request that the legislation be
passed by unanimous consent. Each office receives the hotline
request and if a Senator is planning to object to the
legislation, they notify the cloakroom of their intent to object.
According to Landrieu's office, one office has notified the
cloakroom that they intend to object but that office is unknown
at this time. A hold on a bill only becomes public knowledge if a
live unanimous consent request was made on the Senate Floor. That
has not occurred yet.
* Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont): Chairman of Senate Judiciary
Committee. A spokesperson in the Judiciary Committee office tells
NewsChannel 13 that Leahy has cleared this legislation to be
discharged from the committee but there needs to be a unanimous
agreement for that to happen. They say somewhere along the line
there has been a hold placed on the legislation. Since Leahy has
cleared it, the hold issue goes to the Senate Majority office
(Sen. Harry Reid).
* Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nevada): Senate Majority Leader.
NewsChannel 13 contacted Reid's office and asked where the
legislation stands and who placed a hold on it. We received an
email saying the Senate was very busy and it's not clear when the
legislation would come to the Senate floor. As for the hold, they
said "... this is Sen. Landrieu's bill. You should contact
her office regarding this." We then asked if Reid supports this
legislation. We are awaiting a response.
* Secret Holds Legislation: This was created and signed into
law in 2007 to provide greater transparency in the legislative
process. We thought, since a secret hold may be at play here, it
would be interesting to provide you information on the law. Here
is a link to the text
<http://frwebgate. access.gpo. gov/cgi-bin/ getdoc.cgi? dbname=110_ co\
ng_public_laws& docid=f:publ081. 110
> .
State Legislation
New York State
Senate S3178 Prohibits the slaughter of horses for human
consumption
Track the bill
<http://open. nysenate. gov/openleg/ api/html/ bill/S3178>
* Sen. Frank Padavan (R,C 11th District): Sponsor. A spokesman
in Padavan's office tells us this legislation was first
introduced in 2004. Since then, it has passed in the state Senate
four times; 2005 (vote 59 to 1); 2006 (vote 59 to 0); 2007 (vote
60 to 1); 2008 (vote 58 to 0)
Assembly A3736 Prohibits the slaughter of horses for human
consumption
Track the bill <http://assembly. state.ny. us/leg/?bn= A03736>
* Assemblyman Deborah Glick (66th District): Sponsor. October
28, 2009 A staffer says this bill was first introduced in 2004
but has not yet made it out of the Assembly Agriculture and
Markets Committee. Staffer says they have a lot of people that
contact them in favor of this bill but the Farm Bureau opposition
keeps it from moving on.

forwarded by:

Robin J. Yager,  Director
Network Partners for Animals*
* We do not sanction any groups' ethics or actions and offer the Network Partners Group as a networking resource tool.

http://www.partnershelpinganimalscoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com  (remove spacing)
Spring Farm CARES
3364 Route 12
Clinton, NY 13323
315-790-1404

http://www.springfarmcares.org (no spaces)

Life is as dear to the mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants
happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not to die, so
do other creatures. ~ His Holiness The Dalai Lama

 

http://www.drf.com/news/article/106561.html
Breeding | Posted 8/20/2009, 5:57 pm
New York fund adopts cruelty measure
By Matt Hegarty
The New York Thoroughbred Breeding and Development Fund passed a
resolution at a board meeting on Thursday morning that will allow the
fund to freeze any monetary distributions to a breeder who has been
charged with animal cruelty, according to officials of the fund.
The resolution was adopted as a response to the arrest in April of Ernie
Paragallo, an upstate breeder-owner who was eventually charged with 35
counts of animal cruelty based on the alleged conditions of dozens of
horses on his Center Brook Farm in Climax, N.Y., according to Joe
Mahoney, a spokesman for the fund. Under the resolution, the fund can
block the distribution of any monies earned by a breeder until the
charges are resolved, and, if the breeder is found guilty, can
disqualify the awards, Mahoney said.
Paragallo had earned awards from the program over the past ten years
that put him in the "top 10" of earners, according to Martin Kinsella,
the executive director of the fund.
Also at the meeting, the board's chairman, John Sabini asked the fund to
form a subcommittee to study whether employees of the fund could report
on the conditions of horses at farms they visit.
The fund currently employs two people to visit all 400 farms that are
eligible to win awards in order to monitor whether stallion and mare
owners comply with registry requirements, Kinsella said, but those
employees do not have any regulatory or enforcement powers.

forwarded by:

Robin J. Yager,  Director
Network Partners for Animals*
* We do not sanction any groups' ethics or actions and offer the Network Partners Group as a networking resource tool.

http://www.partnershelpinganimalscoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com  (remove spacing)
Spring Farm CARES
3364 Route 12
Clinton, NY 13323
315-790-1404

http://www.springfarmcares.org (no spaces)

Life is as dear to the mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants
happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not to die, so
do other creatures. ~ His Holiness The Dalai Lama

 

Begin forwarded message:


 http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/national-news/2009/May/22/New-York-lawmakers- want-to-close-cruelty-loophole.aspx
 Posted: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:53 AM

 New York lawmakers want to close cruelty loophole

 by Paul Post

 New York lawmakers plan to introduce legislation that would close an
 apparent loophole and make mistreatment of race horses a felony.

 On April 10, Thoroughbred owner Ernest Paragallo was charged with 22
 misdemeanor counts of animal cruelty, two days after authorities 
raided  his Center Brook Farm in Climax, Greene County, and seized 177 horses,
 three of which had to be euthanized.

 Paragallo has pleaded not guilty and is free on bail.

 Unlike "Buster’s Law," which deals with the abuse of companion animals
 such as cats and dogs, equine cruelty does not carry felony status.

 Assemblyman Tony Jordan (R-Greenwich) and state Senator Roy McDonald
 (R-Saratoga) both represent portions of Saratoga County, home of
 Saratoga Race Course. The lawmakers are seeking to make cruelty toward
 race horses a felony.

 "As we are discovering now, a race horse breeder can be charged with 
the  significant mistreatment of the animals he is employed to raise and 
care  for, but there is no provision to charge him with a felony or ban him
 from complete involvement in horse racing," Jordan said. "This gap 
needs to be closed and this is exactly what Senator McDonald and I are going
 to work towards accomplishing by putting forward this legislation to
 bring about this necessary change.”

 The bill, expected to be introduced shortly, would specifically be
 geared toward race horses, not farm animals. It would fall under state
 racing and wagering law, not agriculture and markets.

 Jordan and McDonald said they plan to meet with racing leaders to make
 sure the law helps and protects horses and the industry. McDonald is a
 member of the Senate Racing, Wagering and Gaming Committee.

 "We need to ensure the safety of these beautiful and incredible 
animals,  because they play a significant role in the agricultural community 
here in upstate New York," he said. "We also need to protect our nationally
 recognized breeding program by preventing these animals from being
 mistreated, and also having the means to remove the individual who
 instituted that mistreatment. It is also important to recognize that
 studies have shown that people who hurt animals will eventually cause
 harm to other people."

 A legal conference between prosecutors and Paragallo’s attorney is
scheduled for June 22. The state Racing and Wagering Board and New 
York  Racing Association have stripped him of all racing privileges pending
 the outcome of upcoming legal action.

 Paul Post is a New York-based THOROUGHBRED TIMES correspondent

 
 
forwarded by:
 
Robin J. Yager,  Director
Network Partners for Animals*

* We do not sanction any groups' ethics or actions and offer the Network Partners Group as a networking resource tool.
http://www.partnershelpinganimalscoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com  (remove spacing)

Spring Farm CARES
3364 Route 12
Clinton, NY 13323
315-790-1404
 
Life is as dear to the mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants
happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not to die, so
do other creatures. ~ His Holiness The Dalai Lama

 

===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

Animal rights advocates speak out
Tuesday, February 3, 2009 2:54 AM EST
By Dave Canfield
The Record
TROY — Sparked by the December killing of a pet horse in Hoosick, a
collection of animal rights educators and advocates came together
Monday night to discuss plans to reform Buster's Law, which
established aggravated animal cruelty as a felony in New York in 1999.
The discussion at Hudson Valley Community College revolved around the
case of Skye, a mare brutally stabbed to death during a burglary.
The man arrested for the crime, Michael Lohnes, is charged with
felonies for burglary and destruction of property. But due to
language in the law, he faces only a misdemeanor for allegedly
trapping the horse in its stable and stabbing it over a dozen times.
"That means he gets more time for breaking a lock than for doing
this," said Nancy Bonesteel, whose cat Buster became the namesake of
the law, after pictures of the dead horse were shown. "It took two
years to pass Buster's Law. I hope this amendment doesn't take that
long."
The law applies only to "companion animals" and specifically
excluding farm animals. It does apply to race horses and show horses,
however, but despite owner Dawn Feathers's claims that Skye was
exhibited in shows on occasion, the misdemeanor has not been upgraded
to the felony, which carries up to two years in prison.
By definition, a misdemeanor must carry less than one year.
"The confusing thing about the law is that a farm animal can be a
pet," said Valerie Lang, a professor at HVCC who teaches a class in
animal law. "It's not for commercial purposes. It's your baby; that's
what Skye was to Dawn."
Skye's Amendment, as it is being called, would attempt to simplify
the language of the law to apply to all animals that are not raised
for food.
To the vocal supporters present Monday, the need for reform is
simple. Numerous statistics were cited that link violence against
animals to violence against humans, including one that found nearly
two-thirds of those imprisoned for violent crimes admitted to also
harming animals. Another found that 44 percent of animal abusers went
on to harm people and 70 percent went on to commit other crimes.
"The correlation is obvious," Lang said, urging her students and
others in attendance to write to officials. "The legislators don't
make the connection."
Lohnes, who allegedly had a grudge against the owner of the barn, was
arrested by State Police on Jan. 5 after several days on the run. The
25-year-old is expected to appear in Rensselaer County Court at a
future date.
Before beginning the discussion, which also included Rensselaer
County Sheriff Jack Mahar and Sue McDonough, a retired state trooper
who investigated hundreds of animal abuse cases, Feathers showed a
slide show featuring Skye. The show began when she bought the mare,
which was facing euthanasia for health problems, for one dollar,
continued through her rehabilitation of Skye and ended with graphic
pictures of the horse stabbed to death.
"I'm still trying to absorb, as much as I've seen these pictures,
that this is my horse this happened to," she said.
After the discussion, she said she was pleased with the support that
has developed for the cause. In addition to supporters present Monday
and statements in favor of such an amendment by Assembly Minority
Leader Jim Tedisco, who spearheaded Buster's Law, an online petition
for stiff prosecution has gathered over 1,200 signatures worldwide.
"At least now we have a direction to go in," Feathers said. "But the
hard part, I've always known, is getting lawmakers to agree something
needs to be changed."
URL:
http://www.troyrecord.com/articles/2009/02/03/news/doc4987ddafb9511515139849.prt
forwarded by:

Robin J. Yager,  Director
Network Partners for Animals*
* We do not sanction any groups' ethics or actions and offer the Network Partners Group as a networking resource tool.

http://www.partnershelpinganimalscoalition-subscribe@yahoogroups.com  (remove spacing)
Spring Farm CARES
3364 Route 12
Clinton, NY 13323
315-790-1404

http://www.springfarmcares.org (no spaces) 

Life is as dear to the mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants
happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not to die, so
do other creatures. ~ His Holiness The Dalai Lama

Original info on Skye:

Hi Everyone-

Below is a link to a websight regarding Skye's death and who to contact and write to, to help get an Amendment passed for Busters law.

I'm asking for people to at least take a look.    

One of the issues Val has is the DA's office is still only charging Michael with a misdemeanor for Skye's killing.  That means he get "up to a yr in Jail" for her killing.  

 As Nancy Bonesteel put it "So he will get more time for breaking a lock than killing the horse?"   Sheriff Jack Mahar said  "yes he will!"  

If you could pass this on to anyone horse person or not...  it will affect ALL animals as pets.  That's our goal... to help define "pet" regardless of how big or small. 

Val has done a superb job on this.   If anyone has ANY suggestions to it...  Please feel free to offer them.  

Thank you
Dawn
The horse you get off is not the same as the horse you got on;
It is our job as a rider to ensure that as often as possible the change is for the better.
-Anonymous
--- On Thu, 2/5/09, Valerie Lang <v.lang@hvcc.edu> wrote:
> From: Valerie Lang <v.lang@hvcc.edu>
> Subject: Please review - Skye's website 

 https://www.hvcc.edu/deptweb-animaloutreach/alerts.html
> What should I add?
> I'm sorry it isn't catchier but it's easy to
> read and factual. I don't have a lot of bells and
> whistles on this program.
> Valerie A. Lang, J.D., M.L.S.
> Assistant Professor
> Hudson Valley Community College
> 80 Vandenburgh Avenue
> Troy, NY 12180
> 518.629.7319 (V)
> 518.629.7509 (F)
> https://www.hvcc.edu/deptweb-animaloutreach/events.html

Update:

Hi Everyone-

This is a very very quick update on Skye.

Sue McDonough received a call from Jim Tedisco. Jim is a Monority Assmeblyman. We needed someone like him to get the Amendment introduced. Val who has been absolutely awesome in all this and is good friends with Sue. Sue is a Retired NY State Trooper who wrote the manual on investigating Animal Cruelty.

There are two emails below... I hope they explain themselves. I will try to email more when i have a minute. I'm am heading to bed in minutes. Lots of projects going on, including throwing up fencing and a 3 sided shelter to bring my horse to my parents where I'm living now.

I miss Skye everyday!! I carry a Picture around of her. And I still cry. So if anybody wants to make money... Invest in Kleenex... I'm keeping the Kleenex Industry afloat I swear. :)

I thought it was going to be months before Skye's Amendment got introduced, so did Val. But we are not complaining.

Had an appt with the DA's office tuesday at 10am. They WILL be prosecuting what happened to Skye as a FELONY under 353-a.
353-a is Busters Law.
The A.D.A. was very confident of this charge. It won't do anything for his time but he IS going to State Prison for the burglary and criminal mischief.

Heading to bed for now... will email more soon

Dawn

The horse you get off is not the same as the horse you got on;
It is our job as a rider to ensure that as often as possible the change is for the better.
-Anonymous

--- On Wed, 2/25/09, Valerie Lang <v.lang@hvcc.edu> wrote:

> From: Valerie Lang <v.lang@hvcc.edu>
> Subject: Re: SKYE's Amendment Introduced!

> Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 3:12 PM
> Sue, what a way to start the day. Once again you are my
> hero (musings from Val on the side here).
>
> I will pass this along, to Dawn (Skye's Mom), the
> D.A.'s office, etc.
>
> Also, Dawn and I met with the D.A. yesterday and his office
> is most definitely prosecuting what happened to Skye as a
> FELONY under 353-a. The A.D.A. had done her homework and
> recognized the law can be interpreted to inclde farm animals
> as companion animals, but it is confusing (and therefore the
> need for Step 2 - Skye's Amendment).
>
> Great work everybody. Biggest admiration for Dawn
> Feathers. The pictures of what happened to her beloved Skye
> are gruesome and violent.
>
> Thanks again Sue for this huge step forward. And, what a
> great example for others out there who think change
> can't happen.
>
> VAL
>
> Valerie A. Lang
> Faculty Librarian / Assistant Professor
> Hudson Valley Community College
> 80 Vandenburgh Avenue
> Troy, NY 12180
>
> 518.629.7319 (V)
> 518.629.7509 (F)
>
> https://www.hvcc.edu/deptweb-animaloutreach/events.html


> Val & Dick,
>
> Yesterday, I received a call from Jim Tedisco. He wanted to
> know what he could do about strengthening the Felony Cruelty Law. We
> both agreed that now would be a good time to try since the thought of
> "Skye" and the way in which she was tortured is still fresh in the minds > of many people who live here in the
> Capital District. He said he would have his Chief of Staff
> call me back.
> Later that day, I did get a call from Chief Counsel Mike
> Cuevas and the attached is what Tedisco's office will be introducing.
>
> Could you both pass on this good news and inform
> everybody? Jim Tedisco also said to me that "If I'm elected to Congress, I will still do all that I can
> to help animals."
> NYSHA worked with Assemblyman Tedisco to promote
> "Buster's Law" 12 years ago, and I know that he's sincere.
>
> Sue

 

From: Christine Berry [mailto:EquineProtectionNetwork@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 12:53 PM
To: Hedy

Subject: RE: Two Old caNY Horses Needing Homes or else.....

It is against the law in CT, NY, NJ, & PA to sell these horses because they are LAME.

The owner can be informed of the law and then the owner can do the responsible thing and put them down.

http://www.equineprotectionnetwork.com/statutes/SellStatutes.htm

Responsible owners put their lame horses down. They do not expect someone else to pay for their horse - a horse that they used, made money off of, received enjoyment from - and under their care became lame and now because of their lameness, they no longer choose to pay for, or make the decision to put down.

Irresponsible owners dump the horses on someone else and let them take financial responsibility, or force someone else to make the hard and very unpleasant decision to put the horse down.

Most owners do not realize they are violating the law by offering them for sale and when informed, do the right thing.

Christine Berry

Equine Protection Network

www.SaveAmericasHorses.com
www.HoofPAC.com
 

http://www.allivet.com/?Click=77428

 

 
North Dakota:
===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:53 pm (PDT)

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate
by: Pat Raia
March 12 2009, Article # 13765
Print Email NEW! Add to Favorites RSS ShareThis
Idaho has joined the list of states pondering legislation aimed at maintaining control of equine transport and re-establishing the horse processing industry in the United States.
Introduced into Idaho's House State Affairs Committee this week by State Rep. Thomas F. Loertscher, HJM 005 instructs Idaho's congressional delegation to vote against the Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503). The federal measure would impose a nationwide ban on the transport of horses for slaughter.
Resolutions similar to Idaho's have passed in:
a.. Kansas (HCR 5004)
b.. South Dakota (SCR 2)
c.. Utah (HJR 7)
d.. Wyoming (HJR 8)
Similar resolutions are pending in:
a.. Arizona (SCM 1001)
b.. Minnesota (SF 133)
c.. North Dakota (HB 1496)
d.. Arkansas (HCR 1004)
e.. Missouri (House, HCR 19; Senate, SCR 8)
Meanwhile, legislators in the following states are considering bills that would amend current state laws to promote the development of horse slaughter plants by private investors:
a.. Illinois (HB 0583)
b.. Montana (HB 418)
c.. Tennessee (HB 1361)
Read more about these bills.
The bills are the first to establish horse processing facilities in the United States since 2007, when lawmakers in Texas and in Illinois shuttered slaughter plants in those states. Horses are currently shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for markets in Europe and Asia.
Keep an eye on TheHorse.com for updates as this situation develops.
Click here to contact your Senator. Click here to contact your Representative.

 

Fw: [AC4HAHS]  North Dakota's bill for slaughter plant study, schedu

Posted by: "Horse Helping" horsehelping@gmail.com   eaglewhowatches

Sun Mar 1, 2009 10:13 pm (PST)
_________________________________________________________
1. North Dakota's bill for slaughter plant study, scheduled Thursday
Posted by: "Valerie James-Patton" valerie_jamespatton@yahoo.com
valerie_jamespatton
Date: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:38 pm ((PST))
http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/232669/
Published March 01 2009
North Dakota Legislature
By: Janell Cole,
BISMARCK – College budgets, a horse slaughtering study, Heritage Center and
prison expansion projects and state employee raises are some of the issues
highlighting legislative hearings this week.
Lawmakers are also still considering a flurry of proposed constitutional
amendments, several of which concern oil tax trust funds and legislative
redistricting. Two were assigned to the Senate Industry, Business and Labor
Committee to facilitate pressing deadlines. All resolutions must be out of
committees by Thursday.
Hearing for horse slaughter is scheduled:
Thursday
House Bill 1496 – Study horse slaughter plant, 9:30 a.m., Senate Agriculture
Committee, Brynhild Haugland Room.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 4021 – Urges Congress to recognize need for
horse slaughter facilities, 10:15 a.m., House Agriculture Committee, Peace
Garden Room.

 

 
Oklahoma:
BILL TO ALLOW TAX BREAK TO COMPANIES WISHING TO OPEN A HORSE SLAUGHTERPLANT IN OKLAHOMA!!! VOTE IS ANY TIME AFTER FEB 6!!!
This is a Bill that has been proposed and will go up for vote sometime after the 6th of February. PLEASE read and share. I spoke with Lewis Moore's Legislative Assistant today and passed on my feelings and concerns. She said that she even got some education from our little chat. She said that the more people that call their Representative and voice their feelings and concerns, the better chance of...... getting them to vote No on this Bill. If you live in the Jones area, Lewis Moore's phone number is 405-557-7400 if you are unsure of your Representative, please go to www.okhouse.gov and look them up. We don't need to give any incentives to those who want to open and run a Horse Slaughter House (facility) in Oklahoma
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012)
HOUSE BILL 2758 By: McPeak
AS INTRODUCED
An Act relating to revenue and taxation; authorizing income tax credit for qualified horse slaughter facility; defining terms; prescribing amount of income tax credit; prohibiting use of credit to reduce tax liability to less than certain amount; authorizing carryover; providing for codification; and providing an effective date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 2357.501 of Title 68, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
A. As used in this section:
1. “Horse slaughter facility” means real property and improvements to real property the principal purpose of which is the commercial slaughter of horses or other equines for profit;
2. “Qualified horse slaughter facility” means a horse slaughter facility constructed, refurbished or converted on or after January 1, 2012, within the State of Oklahoma.
B. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011, there shall be allowed a credit against the tax imposed pursuant to Section 2355 of Title 68 of the Oklahoma Statutes in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the cost for the construction, refurbishment or conversion of a qualified horse slaughter facility.
C. The credit authorized by the provisions of this section shall not be used to reduce the liability of the taxpayer to less than zero (0).
D. Any credit otherwise authorized pursuant to the provisions of this section not used to offset a tax liability may be carried over, in order, to each of the succeeding five (5) taxable years.
SECTION 2. This act shall become effective January 1, 2012.
53-2-9165 MAH 01/18/12
See More
Oklahoma House of Representatives - Home Page
www.okhouse.gov
Oklahoma House of Representative Legislature's Website where you can follow the introduction of measures, committee actions, and votes.
Oklahoma House of Representatives - Home Page
www.okhouse.gov
Oklahoma House of Representative Legislature's Website where you can follow the introduction of measures, committee actions, and votes

 

 
Oregon:

Fw: Help us Stop SB262 - the licensing of horses in Oregon

Posted by: "Alli" horsehelping@gmail.com   eaglewhowatches

Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:10 pm (PST)
----- Original Message -----
From: WWAR
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 2:47 PM
Subject: Help us Stop SB262 - the licensing of horses in Oregon
This bill has slipped past and is now in Committee. Urgent attention is needed to stop this. Even if you don't live in Oregon and/or own a horse, you may know someone that does. If this bill passes in Oregon, your State may be next. Help us spread the word.
Stop SB262 Today! This bill is in Committee at this time and will affect all horse owners in the State of Oregon by forcing you to register every one of your horses at $100 each, annually. Not complying will result in a fine up to $1000. This is an urgent request.
This affects horse owners, breeders, haulers, trainers, and forces individual horse rescues to register as an incorporated non-profit with the State. It gives the government one more thing to control in our lives.
No more trail rides, 4H shows, other competition events, adopting, selling, hauling, training, etc. without complying with the State. This is outrageous.
Read the bill in its entirety here: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measures/sb0200.dir/sb0262.intro.html
Contact your State senator and tell them NO. For a list of Senators and other representatives, you can visit http://www.leg.state.or.us/senate/, or go to www.whisperingwindsequinerescue.com and download the list.
Please, let's keep government out of one more area of our lives. Even sending horses to sale yards will be affected. Due to the current state of the economy, this bill will only contribute to more horses going to slaughter to be butchered. How much do you love your beloved companion? Stop this today. Sign the petition today.... Stop SB262 - Licensing horses and other animals in Oregon
Susan Pohlman, Director
Whispering Winds Ranch
Living Legends Wild Horse Sanctuary
Roseburg, Oregon
(541) 679-9022
www.whisperingwindsequinerescue.com

 

Oregon is headed in the right direction.
On February 12th, I testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee in favor of SB 398, adding equines to the current dog and cat abandonment statute. (There currently is no law against abandoning your horse in Oregon.  You may leave it in your neighbors field, making it his responsibility, or turn it loose on a highway to get hit in traffic.  The act itself is not illegal.)  Contrary to what some would have you believe, the bill does not make this a felony, nor does it reclassify horses from livestock to domestic.  It WILL give law enforcement a leg to stand on and will help with property owners rights.
I took with me several large pictures of Scout, Magic and Summer -  3 abandoned horses I picked up in December.  As I showed the senators their faces, I asked them what THEY would do if they woke up to find these three, or any others, standing in their back yard, tied to their horse trailer, or turned loose in their boarding facility.
The bill now moves on for a full vote in the Senate, date to be set.
Darla
Begin forwarded message:

From: "Scott Beckstead" <sbeckstead@hsus.org>
Date: March 3, 2009 9:48:40 AM PST
To: Subject: SB 398, Horse Abandonment
Following a work session today, SB 398, adding equines to the animal abandonment statute, passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee to the full Senate with a unanimous “do pass” recommendation.  
The bill includes the amendment to clarify that horses are not being reclassified as “domestic animals,” but will remain “livestock.”  The bill is being carried by Senator Doug Whitsett, the Republican from Klamath Falls.  After noting that he had received a number of contacts from concerned constituents, Senator Whitsett read onto the record an opinion from the office of Legislative Counsel confirming that the bill will NOT have the effect of reclassifying equines as “domestic animals.”
Scott Beckstead
Senior Oregon Director
The Humane Society of the United States
(541)530-8509
sbeckstead@humanesociety.org

 

 
Pennsylvania:

Pennsylvania Bill Creates Animal Abuser Registry

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Apr 21, 2011 4:56 pm (PDT)
http://www.thehorse.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=18141

 

 
Rhode Island:

RI Peeps:  House Votes to Support Horse Slaughter BAN!

Posted by: "Beth" fatoldfarmwife@verizon.net   bethofneer

Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:45 pm (PDT)
The Rhode Island House of Representatives has passed a resolution
calling for passage of the Equine Prevention of Cruelty Act, H.R.
503/S.B. 727, which would stop the slaughter of American horses for
human consumption.
[Horse] WHAT YOU CAN DO
Support Rhode Island's bill, H.R. 6026. Urge the Rhode Island Senate to
pass this resolution. Find an email and phone list for Rhode Island
state senators here.
<http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/Email/SenEmailListDistrict.asp> If you
live in Rhode Island, go here <http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/Senate/> to
find your state senator.
More info: http://forums.prospero.com/alexbrown/messages?msg=35877.2
<http://forums.prospero.com/alexbrown/messages?msg=35877.2>
Go here <http://www.animallawcoalition.com/horse-slaughter/article/567>
for information about the federal bill, H.R. 503/S.B. 727 and how you
can help pass it.

 

RI bans double deckers..

Posted by: "martinmaryd@comcast.net" martinmaryd@comcast.net   wyattcactus

Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:45 pm (PDT)

http://www.thehorse.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=12128
Rhode Island General Assembly Passes Equine Transport Measure
by: Edited Press Release
June 24 2008, Article # 12128
The Rhode Island General Assembly has passed legislation to ban the use
of double-decker trucks to transport horses in the state. Sen. Dominick
Ruggerio, D-Providence, and Rep. Amy Rice, D-Portsmouth, introduced the
legislation in response to an accident that occurred last year in
Illinois. That accident resulted in the death of 18 young Belgian draft
horses after a double-decker cattle truck overturned.
"The Humane Society of the United States is grateful to Senator Ruggerio
and Representative Rice for spearheading this important legislation to
protect horses," said Keith Dane, director of equine protection for the
HSUS. "We have seen grisly and tragic accidents in other states, and the
best way to protect horses from such horrors is to enact common-sense
policies to protect them during transport."
Federal legislation is currently pending to ban the use of double-decker
trailers for transporting horses (H.R. 6278), and to end horse slaughter
for human consumption and prohibit the export of horses for slaughter in
other countries (S. 311/H.R. 503).
--
Mary D. Martin - MA Rep/Director NEER
www.newenglandequinerescues.com

 

 
South Carolina:
===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

 
South Dakota:

Fw: One More email before I shut down for DC - Just for Tamara

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:20 am (PDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: Vicki Tobin
To: Vicki Tobin
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:47 PM
Subject: One More email before I shut down for DC - Just for Tamara
And what a way to go. This woman is just unbelievable. Nothing like getting my blood pressure up before I leave for DC.
"The only thing preventing investment and jobs creation in a number of states is the inability to inspect horse meat for interstate and export purposes."
Oh, I could just write a novel with this one..
Vicki | A Voice for Our Horses
From: United Orgs of the Horse
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:56 PM
Subject: Press Release: South Dakota legislation calls for reinstatement of federal horse meat inspection
Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
You're receiving this email because of your relationship with the United Orgs of the Horse or the United Horsemen's Front. Please confirm your continued interest in receiving email from us.
You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.
Press Release
a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation registered in Wyoming - IRS 501(c)(6) status pending
an IRS 501(c)(3) educational & charitable organization
Contact Us
Office:
1902 Thomes, Suite 202B
Cheyenne, WY 82001
Sue Wallis
United Orgs of the Horse (UOH)
Executive Director
307 680 8515 cell
307 685 8248 ranch
Dave Duquette
United Horsemen's Front (UHF)
Executive Director
541 571 7588
Krissa Thom
UOH & UHF
Operations Manager
307 689 8536
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 23, 2010
Contact:
Sue Wallis
307 680 8515 cell
307 685 8248 ranch
sue.wallis@unitedorgsofthehorse.org
South Dakota's Legislature Passes Strongly Worded Resolution Calling on Congress and the Federal Government to Reinstate USDA Inspection of Horse Meat
The only thing preventing investment and jobs creation in a number of states is the inability to inspect horse meat for interstate and export purposes.
PIERRE - South Dakota State Senator Frank Kloucek announced today that a concurrent resolution calling on Congress to repeal roadblocks to the humane slaughter of horses, and the inspection of horse meat has passed by an overwhelming majority with only three no votes.
Just a few short years ago the equine industry was a $1.2 Billion dollar industry that supported some 460,000 direct full-time jobs working with horses every day, and another 1,600,000 indirect jobs. All indications are that the equine industry will have been effectively downsized by at least 50% in very short order, and have suffered the loss of at least 500,000 jobs.
Most of this can be laid squarely in the lap of the animal rights driven effort that led to the closure of the last U.S. horse processing plants in 2007. While some will claim that all of this economic distress is the result of the current nationwide situation, others will point out that the horse industry survived the economic downturn of the 1980s relatively intact.
Worst of all, the horses are suffering. The website, http://amillionhorses.com, has been documenting every media report of abandoned, neglected, and abused horses since the early 1990s and the increase in suffering is absolutely horrific. There was a 400% increase in stories detailing neglect and abandonment of horses from 2008 to 2009.
A young, starving feral horse found on the Navajo Nation with its hind end eaten by wild dogs while still alive. It had to be euthanized.
Members and supporters of the United Organizations of the Horse wholeheartedly believe that the key to rejuvenating the entire equine industry, and stopping the suffering of horses, is allowing for the option of a quick, humane death for unneeded horses, and the utilization of the healthy, wholesome meat by those who choose to do so.
There is a thriving worldwide market for horse meat. As was recently noted by Claude Bouvary, the owner of Bouvary Exports in Canada, one of the leading purveyors of horse meat worldwide, "Around the world today, there are as many meals of horse meat served every day, as there are McDonald's hamburgers."
There is a burgeoning underground interest in horse meat in the United States, and for good reason, the meat is very high in protein, very low in fat, and delicious. Gourmet chefs as well as those who are interested in wholesome, healthy meats from sustainable sources and well cared for animals are importing the meat. Others are obtaining it from local sources where that is legal.
The full text of the South Dakota Resolution is below.
###
The website, www.UnitedOrgsoftheHorse.org, is currently undergoing a major overhaul, and does not yet include recent updates, but a good deal of information can be found on that site.
South Dakota Concurrent Resolution
State of South Dakota
EIGHTY-FIFTH SESSION
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 2010
354R0767
SENATE ENGROSSED NO. SCR 4 - 3/2/2010
Introduced by: Senators Kloucek, Bartling, Bradford, Garnos, and Maher and Representatives Schrempp, Frerichs, Greenfield, Hoffman, Lederman, Nygaard, Olson (Betty), Sorenson, and Verchio
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Opposing certain federal legislation related to equine slaughter and processing and urging the reinstatement and funding of federal inspection programs governing equine slaughter and processing facilities.
WHEREAS, the slaughter and processing of horses has become a controversial and contentious issue, which has resulted in the closing of the last horse processing and slaughter facility in the United States; and
WHEREAS, thousands of unwanted horses annually are exposed to abandonment and neglect because of the cessation of horse slaughter in the United States. These additional abandoned horses compete for adoption with wild horses that are fed and sheltered at public expense. The nation's overburdened horse rescue facilities cannot absorb the influx of additional unwanted and abandoned horses that result from the cessation of equine slaughter, processing, and transport activity; and
WHEREAS, pending legislation in Congress, the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, would further restrict actions related to horse slaughter and horse processing, and would prohibit the transport and export of horses outside of the United States for the purpose of slaughter for human consumption. This legislation includes H.R. 503, S. 727, and similar legislation that only exacerbates the problem; and
WHEREAS, if transport of horses to Mexico and Canada for slaughter and processing for human consumption is prohibited, as the current legislation before Congress proposes, the number of additional abandoned horses in the United States will increase even further; and
WHEREAS, in 2005, Congress removed funding for USDA inspection programs for horse slaughter and processing intended for human consumption. These funding bans have continued for several years and have effectively prevented the operation of slaughter facilities; and
WHEREAS, horse processing facilities cannot operate in the United States unless federal inspection for such facilities is funded and reinstated; and
WHEREAS, there is a critical need for humane horse processing facilities in the United States to reduce the suffering inflicted on unwanted and abandoned horses and to meet overseas export markets for horsemeat in a humane manner:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Senate of the Eighty-fifth Legislature of the State of South Dakota, the House of Representatives concurring therein, that the South Dakota Legislature urges the Congress and the United States Department of Agriculture to reinstate and fully fund USDA's inspection program for equine slaughter and processing facilities; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the South Dakota Legislature urges the Congress to defeat the current Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, including H.R. 503 and S.727 and related legislation.

 

===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:53 pm (PDT)

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate
by: Pat Raia
March 12 2009, Article # 13765
Print Email NEW! Add to Favorites RSS ShareThis
Idaho has joined the list of states pondering legislation aimed at maintaining control of equine transport and re-establishing the horse processing industry in the United States.
Introduced into Idaho's House State Affairs Committee this week by State Rep. Thomas F. Loertscher, HJM 005 instructs Idaho's congressional delegation to vote against the Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503). The federal measure would impose a nationwide ban on the transport of horses for slaughter.
Resolutions similar to Idaho's have passed in:
a.. Kansas (HCR 5004)
b.. South Dakota (SCR 2)
c.. Utah (HJR 7)
d.. Wyoming (HJR 8)
Similar resolutions are pending in:
a.. Arizona (SCM 1001)
b.. Minnesota (SF 133)
c.. North Dakota (HB 1496)
d.. Arkansas (HCR 1004)
e.. Missouri (House, HCR 19; Senate, SCR 8)
Meanwhile, legislators in the following states are considering bills that would amend current state laws to promote the development of horse slaughter plants by private investors:
a.. Illinois (HB 0583)
b.. Montana (HB 418)
c.. Tennessee (HB 1361)
Read more about these bills.
The bills are the first to establish horse processing facilities in the United States since 2007, when lawmakers in Texas and in Illinois shuttered slaughter plants in those states. Horses are currently shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for markets in Europe and Asia.
Keep an eye on TheHorse.com for updates as this situation develops.
Click here to contact your Senator. Click here to contact your Representative.

 

Important information regarding wild horses and SD Rep Sue Wallis
 
From: NewEnglandEquineRescues@yahoogroups.com [mailto:NewEnglandEquineRescues@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Marge
Important information regarding wild horses and SD Rep Sue Wallis
Please cross post.
 
Earlier today I sent all of you an editorial that I wrote which was published in OpEd News this morning.  If you didn't get a chance to read it, please do so.  But in case you didn't read it, SD Rep. Sue Wallis introduced 'The Horse Industry Policy' to the National Conference of State Legislators (a non-governmental lobbyiest group who lobbies to the federal Congress members on behalf of state legislators) and in Dec it passed the NCSL vote of state legislators, aided by Conrad Burns.  It was because of the passage of that resolution, that the states recently introduced their own resolutions to bring the slaughter facilities back to the U.S. and they're asking Congress not to pass HR503, and not to interfere with the transport or export of horses to slaughter.  Needless to say, whether the facilities return or not, these resolutions ensure that horses will continue to be exported for slaughter, despite that their claims that they hope that bringing the facilities back, will stop the the export of horses where they're slaughtered under unregulated, horrible and inhumane conditions.
The letter below is a letter from Rep. Wallis outlining talking points for her agriculture and pro-slaughter supporters.  She's getting her people organized to set up slaughter facilities in the U.S., and serve our domestic and wild horses to feed the hungry. 
This woman thinks all the BLM wild horses should be put to use to feed the hungry and starving in the world, claims without horse slaughter, the U.S. horse industry will be destroyed, an have no breeders and no horses.
Claims the true agenda of anyone supporting HR503 is to impose a vegan lifestyle on everyone, which is dangerous to the brains of babies and children, and will severly handipcapp the next generation. She wants it broadcasted from Temple Grandin's recent book that animals lead a happy life because they have their needs for sufficient food, clean water, proper handling AND a quick and painless death when they are processed into food.
 
The actual language of 'The Horse Industry Policy'  does state that domestic horses are abandoned and turned loose on public lands and are destroying the ecosystem and wild life habitat, and compete with BLM wild horses for adoption.  That's pretty wild that something this ridiculous could actually become a piece of legislation passed by legislators (although Conrad Burns was 'instrumental' in getting it passed, and he's got a record for getting outrageous legislation passed before anyone knows the content of the legislation).  But at least this crazy plan for the wild horses wasn't in that legislation. I wonder if more legislators were aware of her plan written in this letter, would they accept it without question, or come to realize she's a radical whack job?
We all need to be aware of this woman, and maybe there's something we can do to show she's not in her right mind.  Even her policy resolutions don't make sense, and you'll see why from the article I wrote.
I marked in the bold the main points of her talking points for easier reading....only my comments are in red.  Everything in black, is her letter.
 
This is the letter Rep. Wallis has circulated to her followers:
 
 
Dear friends,

I have developed this list of talking points and action items over the last months of working so hard to protect the horse industry, and the horse people that I love from the horrific consequences being foisted upon us all by radical animal rights activists, and thought I would share them with you all. Please let me know if you can think of anything to add.

Specific things you can do to help protect animal agriculture...

In opposition to the Burton-Conyers HB 503 - Prevention of Cruelty to Equines Act that has been introduced in the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives in the US Congress.

First of all...know what we are all up against...let me point to just a couple of the headlines out of the bill that has been introduced-from the transportation statement, "to prohibit the shipping, transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing, selling or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption, and for any other purposes;"(that covers about everything!) "horses and other equines are domestic animals that are used primarily for recreation, pleasure, and sport;"(also used for work, and for the majority of world cultures for food) "the movement, showing, exhibition, or sale of sore horses in intrastate commerce, and the shipping, transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing, selling, or donation in intrastate commerce of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption, adversely affect and burden interstate and foreign commerce;" ("sore" is a very loose term that could be applied to practically any horse under a lot of different circumstances) and "the Secretary may detain for examination, testing, or the taking of evidence-(the horse)-any horse at any horse show, horse exhibition, or horse sale or auction which is sore or which the Secretary has probable cause to believe is sore." (Unconstitutional search and seizure!) According to Thomas Arens, a licensed Equine Professional and Auctioneer in Markleville, Indiana who pointed this out to me, the intent of the bill is to have a USDA official to be able to stop any horses being transported anywhere and take a swab sample of their legs. If the swab sample shows an astringent or a countered irritant then the assumption is that they must be transporting them to slaughter and the official will have the right to impound the horse.

I am sure that I don't have to tell you what the implications are...and what the horrific imposition is just about to be foisted upon all of agriculture. If they can do this to me...let me assure you that we are one hair-breadth away from telling a dairy man that he can no longer market his cows when they don't breed back, or any other kind of livestock producer whose stock is not producing as they should. This is a clarion call to action for everyone in agriculture.
 
 
1. Talk to everybody. Talk to the media. Talk to livestock and agriculture groups. Talk to animal rescue and recovery groups. Talk to local governments. Talk to concerned citizens...and tell everyone of them to talk to everybody they know, and write Congress...particularly the House Judicial Committee where the Burton-Conyers HB 503 Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act has been introduced...and to both the House and Senate Agriculture Committees who need to challenge the appropriateness of that Committee, and weigh in with all of the weight of our rural and horse-loving citizens behind them. Here is a link to the House Judiciary Committee, House Agriculture Committee, Senate Agriculture Committee, and a contact list for the entire Congress so that you can contact your own Senators and Representatives. Below you will find a PowerPoint that you can use if you like...
2 What should you tell them?
Make sure they understand the true agenda of the animal rights organizations backing this measure-imposing a vegan lifestyle on all of America-go to www.HumaneWatch.org yourselves, and point everyone you have any contact with that way-find out what the 7 Things You Need to Know About the HSUS are...

3. Make sure they hear that a vegan lifestyle is particularly dangerous for our babies and children. Babies and children deprived of animal derived protein through their mother's milk, and through their diets-their brains do not have the nutrients to develop properly-this lifestyle will severely handicap the next generation. Remember that 85% of the human brain's development happens in the first three years of life. Here are a couple of links that back this up: New York Times article - Authorities Say Strict Vegan Diet Endangered Life of Queens Baby; People Magazine - Did This Baby Die from a Vegan Diet?; and Death by Veganism, a New York Times Op Ed written by Nina Planck, author of Real Food.

4. Make sure they understand that most of the world eats horses. Remind them that horses have been used for many purposes, including food, since before the very first animals were domesticated. If we ban the processing of horses in the US it will not stop horses from being eaten-it will just destroy the equine industry here, eliminate the livelihoods of thousands of people, and the jobs of thousands more-at a time when the economy is already suffering tremendously. Here is a quote from a recent broadcast, "Frugal Icelanders Prepare For The Holidays Morning Edition, December 11, 2008 7 Iceland has been hit by the global financial crisis in a big way. With unemployment surging and the currency collapsing, less expensive traditional staples are coming back into fashion. Frugal Icelanders are avoiding imported beers. They are also buying horse meat, which is half the price of beef." ??
 
   (This is the 2nd #4 - not only is this woman a looneytoon, she can't count either)
4.
Tell them that since the plants were closed by state action in the US, that we are now importing more than 500 metric tons of horsemeat into the US.

5. Make sure that every horse owner in the United States-especially the wealthy thoroughbred owners, and warm blood people, clearly understand that if we classify horses as pets, as companion animals-that all of their agriculture related tax benefits will disappear-no more deductions, no more exemptions. Horses are livestock, plain and simple.

6.
Tell them this is not an issue of human euthanasia for un-wanted horses-this is an issue of economics and markets. Without a market there will be no breeders. Without breeders there will be no horses. Period.

7. Tell them that abandoned and neglected horses are overwhelming the rescue and recovery organizations, and that even if you wanted to give away your good, old horse today...you might not be able to find any place to go with him because there is no longer a release valve through the marketing of those horses who will never be anybody's pet-or whose owners need to salvage some economic value out of their property.

Make sure they understand that we have some 33,000 (by BLM count-most ranchers dealing with those ranges say triple that number) so-called wild horses on the Western public lands. Make sure they know that we have another 30,000+ standing in feedlots all over the West at taxpayer expense.

8. Make sure they know that any unregulated, unmanaged horse herd will double itself every 4 years-that they are already destroying the ecosystems and wildlife habitat of our public lands, and that the cost of caring for them off of the lands will grow to $77 million dollars of taxpayer expense by 2012.

9. Remind them that 10 million people starve to death every year in this world...and maybe our excess BLM wild horses could be put to much better use by providing high quality, nutritious animal protein, untainted by BSE-type disease concerns of other livestock to people who could never afford to buy it. Once again, Americans can use an abundant and sustainable resource to come to the aid of the poor and starving of the world.
 
 

10. Encourage your legislature or assembly to send a clear message to the administration and the congress that our state's will not tolerate this clear violation of private property rights, and the blatant interference of the commerce clause of our US Constitution through the disruption of intrastate and foreign free commerce. Here is a link to the HJ0008 Equine Resources resolution that the Wyoming Legislature is passing this year. Feel free to contact me, I have lots of other resolutions from national organizations that you can model language after if you like.

11. We need to have the information and be ready to challenge every assumption-for example, we heard Gene Baur of the Farm Sanctuary in our Animal Rights/Animal Welfare discussion at the State Ag and Rural Leaders meeting invoke the name of Dr. Temple Grandin not once, but twice. We need to take that argument away from them. Dr. Grandin, as most of you probably know is a renowned autistic animal behavior scientist at Colorado State University who does a lot of work with the emotions of animals, and what it takes for an animal to lead a happy life. Her most recent book is a great read, you would enjoy it, Animals Make us Human: creating the best life for animals...the part that Mr. Baur conveniently left out...and which you need to know, understand, and broadcast to everyone is the part where they lead a happy life because they have their needs for sufficient food, clean water, proper handling AND a quick and painless death when they are processed into food. Her other books include Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals; Livestock Handling and Transport; and Humane Livestock Handling, in which she goes into great detail about the design of processing facilities and how they can be set up for efficiency, stress free handling, and humane slaughter.

12. The North Dakota Legislature is ahead of all of us and that they have a bill in their legislature this year to provide $100,000 to study the feasibility of a horse processing plant in their state. Some of that study money needs to very publicly go to Dr. Grandin or somebody like her, to make sure that plant design is designed specifically for horses so that their end-of-life experience is quiet, calm, and stress-free. Those of us in animal agriculture understand completely that that not only makes tremendous animal welfare sense, and we should be able to benefit from that...but it also makes perfect product quality sense...stressed animals equals poor quality meat...pure and simple.

13. Here is the PowerPoint presentation we used to explain the issue to the National Council of State Legislature's Agriculture and Energy Committee. Feel free to use it or change it to whatever advantage you can: ( click here to access the slideshow and many other resources)

I'll conclude this pep talk by telling you a little about why this is so important to me, personally. I come from horse people, in horse country. My Dad was born on the Laramie Plains at the Wallis Brothers Ranch, and they, among other things, raised horses for the Army. They ran Remount studs provided by the Army with 20-25 mares with each stud bunch. Colonel Grey would come out every year to buy 3 and 4 year old geldings ready to train. Colonel Grey once told my grandfather that there were two places in the world that were perfect for raising horses in terms of sound legs, and good hooves-one of them is the bluegrass country of Kentucky, and the other is a 100 mile circle around Sheridan, Wyoming...and that is right where I live. I have great aunts and uncles who were world champion saddle bronc riders in the late 20s and 30s...and all sorts of relatives active in the rodeo world today. My father was a race steward and the very first job that my son Isaac ever held was as a jockey runner at the race track when he was 10 years old. I made my extra money in high school putting 30 to 60 days on green-broke colts. My brother, who lives on the ranch with my folks, my husband and I, raises Belgian and Haflinger horses and went all the way to Ohio to buy his Haflinger stud.

So...horses have always been, and still are, a central part of our lives, the lives of my neighbors, and my constituents. I have committed myself to do everything that I can to preserve this way of life, and I will be happy to go just about anywhere, and talk to anybody. So, if you know of a place or time where I might be able to do some good...drop me a note, or give me a call...
 
So because her brother breeds and raises Belgians, Haflingers, and Belgian/Haflinger crossbred horses, and has relatives active in the rodeo, that qualifies her as a horse person?  On her website, she reveals that her and her husband raise grassfat beef- cattle ranchers.

Thanks,

Sue Wallis
Wyoming House of Representatives
Campbell County - District 52
PO Box 71
Recluse, WY 82725
307 685 8248 - ranch
307 680 8515 - blackberry
http://www.wallis.vcn.com

 

 
.

Lynn Esty

rescueahorse@comcast.net

www.rescueahorse.blogspot.com

 

 
Tennessee:

The worst case of equine abuse in Tennessee history shocked the state. So why is legislation that would stop the abuse meeting so much resistance?

All the Starving Horses 

By Christine Kreyling

http://www.nashvillescene.com/2010-03-11/news/the-worst-case-of-equine-abuse-in-tennessee-history-shocked-the-state-so-why-is-legislation-that-would-stop-the-abuse-meeting-so-much-resistance/

 

From Laura Allen

TN state Rep. Frank Niceley’s pro-horse slaughter bill, very similar to the MT bill, has passed one committee and is now in another. It could be voted on at any time. http://www.animallawcoalition.com/horse-slaughter/article/903

 PLEASE CROSS POST

 

===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:53 pm (PDT)

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate
by: Pat Raia
March 12 2009, Article # 13765
Print Email NEW! Add to Favorites RSS ShareThis
Idaho has joined the list of states pondering legislation aimed at maintaining control of equine transport and re-establishing the horse processing industry in the United States.
Introduced into Idaho's House State Affairs Committee this week by State Rep. Thomas F. Loertscher, HJM 005 instructs Idaho's congressional delegation to vote against the Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503). The federal measure would impose a nationwide ban on the transport of horses for slaughter.
Resolutions similar to Idaho's have passed in:
a.. Kansas (HCR 5004)
b.. South Dakota (SCR 2)
c.. Utah (HJR 7)
d.. Wyoming (HJR 8)
Similar resolutions are pending in:
a.. Arizona (SCM 1001)
b.. Minnesota (SF 133)
c.. North Dakota (HB 1496)
d.. Arkansas (HCR 1004)
e.. Missouri (House, HCR 19; Senate, SCR 8)
Meanwhile, legislators in the following states are considering bills that would amend current state laws to promote the development of horse slaughter plants by private investors:
a.. Illinois (HB 0583)
b.. Montana (HB 418)
c.. Tennessee (HB 1361)
Read more about these bills.
The bills are the first to establish horse processing facilities in the United States since 2007, when lawmakers in Texas and in Illinois shuttered slaughter plants in those states. Horses are currently shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for markets in Europe and Asia.
Keep an eye on TheHorse.com for updates as this situation develops.
Click here to contact your Senator. Click here to contact your Representative.

 

 
Utah:

Legislation: 

From: Tracey Smith <tdsmith.hall@gmail.com>

Date: March 7, 2012 9:53:38 PM EST

Subject: Act Now or Animal Abuse Will Be Illegal to Film and Expose 

Please check out this important information about a Utah bill that could hide from the public the truth about what happens behind the closed doors of factory farms.

-- 

Utah House Bill 187 would make it a crime to photograph or record video or sound of a farm without the farm owner's consent. This absurd and unconstitutional bill, which infringes on Americans' basic rights, is a desperate attempt by agriculture industry giants to prevent consumers from learning the truth about the lives and deaths of animals on factory farms. Past investigations of factory farms resulted in criminal convictions of farm managers and workers found beating, sexually abusing, stomping on, kicking, and throwing animals. 

The meat from slaughtered animals crosses state lines, and the government in Utah needs to hear from consumers across the country who care about the way animals killed for food are treated. 

Please click the link below to take action.  

To take action on this issue, click on the link below:

http://www2.peta.org/site/Advocacy?s_oo=4lLxLkHNsBzlBL3WSYG1Aw&amp;id=4031

If the text above does not appear as a link or it wraps across multiple lines, then copy and paste it into the address area of your browser.

-- 

From: Mburton@hopewellva.gov

Sent: 3/7/2012 2:36:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

Subj: new law in effect in certain states

Taking Undercover Animal Cruelty Videos Now a Crime, Say 4 States

March 4, 2012 

http://oascentral.discovery.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/www.treehugger.com/business/corporate-responsibility/taking-undercover-animal-cruelty-videos-now-a-crime-say-4-states.html/1127682849/Top3/default/empty.gif/51635247556b394f5a69594142646e78?x

-- 

http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/iowa-bill-would-send-you-to-jail-for-10-years-for-exposing-animal-cruelty-on-farms.html

This week, after a year's worth of controversy surrounding an Iowa bill that would make undercover footage and photography at factory farms illegal, the bill passed the Iowa legislature. It's one more hurdle for animal rights activists looking to expose farms that break the rules. 

The Iowa bill makes gaining access to livestock operations under false pretenses a crime. Montana, North Dakota, and Kansas have already enacted similar laws and Illinois, Missouri, Utah, New York, Nebraska, Indiana, and Minnesota are considering such bills. 

"We have a number of activists that want to gain access to farms ... to take some films and make it look as dramatic as they possibly can, to affect the public," Craig Hill, president of the Iowa Farm Bureau, told the agriculture news site Brownfield. But animal welfare groups say that animal producers who want such laws enacted have something to hide, namely criminal animal cruelty. 

Videos Uncover Disgusting Practices

It's no secret that a number of massive animal cruelty rings have been uncovered as a result of such videos including when Mercy for Animals, an animal welfare group, http://www.treehugger.com/natural-sciences/undercover-video-footage-reveals-cruelty-at-one-of-nations-largest-pork-producers-video.html  released a video documenting disgusting conditions at Iowa Select Farms, one of the largest pork producers in the U.S. 

The Humane Society of the United States also released this cruel video

http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/undercover-investigation-oklahoma-pig-farms-reveals-systemic-cruelty-factory-farming-video.html

investigating Seaboard Foods and Prestige Farm, a main supplier to Walmart and then there was when a

http://www.treehugger.com/culture/butterball-turkey-facility-raided-response-horror-video.html  

Butterball facility was raided in response to undercover footage. 

It's unclear whether these criminal acts would have surfaced without such footage and it's a sad day when farmers that engage in criminal animal mistreatment can hide behind the banner of a law which bans their

investigation.

 

UT Bill Would Allow Torture and Killing of "Feral" Animals | Animal Law Coalition

www.animallawcoalition.com

http://www.animallawcoalition.com/animal-cruelty/article/1504

 

===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:53 pm (PDT)

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate
by: Pat Raia
March 12 2009, Article # 13765
Print Email NEW! Add to Favorites RSS ShareThis
Idaho has joined the list of states pondering legislation aimed at maintaining control of equine transport and re-establishing the horse processing industry in the United States.
Introduced into Idaho's House State Affairs Committee this week by State Rep. Thomas F. Loertscher, HJM 005 instructs Idaho's congressional delegation to vote against the Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503). The federal measure would impose a nationwide ban on the transport of horses for slaughter.
Resolutions similar to Idaho's have passed in:
a.. Kansas (HCR 5004)
b.. South Dakota (SCR 2)
c.. Utah (HJR 7)
d.. Wyoming (HJR 8)
Similar resolutions are pending in:
a.. Arizona (SCM 1001)
b.. Minnesota (SF 133)
c.. North Dakota (HB 1496)
d.. Arkansas (HCR 1004)
e.. Missouri (House, HCR 19; Senate, SCR 8)
Meanwhile, legislators in the following states are considering bills that would amend current state laws to promote the development of horse slaughter plants by private investors:
a.. Illinois (HB 0583)
b.. Montana (HB 418)
c.. Tennessee (HB 1361)
Read more about these bills.
The bills are the first to establish horse processing facilities in the United States since 2007, when lawmakers in Texas and in Illinois shuttered slaughter plants in those states. Horses are currently shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for markets in Europe and Asia.
Keep an eye on TheHorse.com for updates as this situation develops.
Click here to contact your Senator. Click here to contact your Representative.

 

States Ask to Retain Control of Equine Transport, Slaughter

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:13 pm (PST)

States Ask to Retain Control of Equine Transport, Slaughter
by: Pat Raia
February 12 2009, Article # 13609
Lawmakers in two Western states have sponsored resolutions urging Congress to let state legislators make up their own minds about horse slaughter issues within their lines. Wyoming's House Joint Resolution (HJR 8) and Utah's House Joint Resolution (HJR 7) both argue the federal Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503) interferes with states' rights to pursue private sector development of horse slaughter processing plants.
Introduced in January, 2009, by U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich) and Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.), HR 503 prohibits the transport, sale, delivery, or export of American horses for slaughter for human consumption. It also criminalizes the purchase, sale, delivery, or export of horsemeat intended for human consumption. The bill remains in committee.
"We can handle (these issues) as a state better than the feds can," said Utah State Rep. Bradley Winn, a sponsor of the resolution. "With this resolution, we're just telling our representatives in Washington how to vote."
Wyoming and Utah are among four states considering legislation promoting horse processing plant development. North Dakota legislators are seeking state funding for a plant development feasibility study, and a Montana bill would change state law to accommodate prospective processing plant investors. (Read more.)
In 2007 state actions brought about the closure of processing plants in Texas and Illinois that were the only facilities in the United States processing horsemeat for human consumption. Currently, horses are shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for human consumption in Europe and Asia.

 

(Note from Brandi:  The newspaper that published this is out of Vernal, Utah.)

againstslaughter] Horse-owner release program proposed

Posted by: "Kitrynak@aol.com" Kitrynak@aol.com   kitrynak

Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:41 pm (PST)

http://www.vernal.com/pages/full_story?hash=comments_1598158&page_label=news&id=1598158&widget=push&instance=news_special_coverage_right_column&article-Horse-owner-release-program-proposed%20=&open=&#comments_1598158
Horse-owner release program proposed
by Mary Bernard
1 hr 59 mins ago | 13 views | 0 0 comments | 0 0 recommendations
The problem of abandoned horses has been a persistent one for the Uintah
Animal Control and Shelter Special Services District over the past year.
In 2008, horses constituted the single largest group of stray livestock
handled by the district. Officers impounded 23 head of horses, 17 head
of cattle and 14 other animals, like sheep, goats, llamas and ferrets.
These numbers represent a full 180-percent increase in livestock
impounds over 2007, much of which end up wandering along local roadways.
Unrestrained livestock on the highways are a danger to the public,
especially to high-speed drivers, and animal control officers spend time
and effort trying to reduce the risk.
For most part, horses are left to wander, say animal control officers,
because of the financial circumstances that horse-owners face nowadays.
The rising cost of feed and transport along with the lack of horse
slaughter houses have left some livestock owners no alternative but to
abandon unwanted horses to the open range.
Many stressed owners do so under the mistaken belief that their horses
will ‘go wild,’ but the truth is far from that. Domestic horses rarely
integrate with wild herds. Most die a long, slow death by starvation and
thirst waiting for food from an owner who will never return.
In response to the dilemma, a proposal was presented Jan 8 at the
regular district meeting by animal control officials tired of recovering
abandoned horses.
The proposal, a proactive approach to the growing problem of cast-off
horses in the county, looks to assist distressed horse owners. The
details of the proposed program include following requirements:
• a $50 owner-release fee
• a brand inspection – mandatory owner pays to transfer the horse to the
district as legal owner,
• and the full cooperation of the Uintah County Brand inspector.
The district shelter would then be able to sell, adopt or give away the
horse immediately.
Currently, the program is considering taking only healthy, uninjured and
relatively young horses. No sick, injured or very old animals will be
accepted, and none will be taken for the sole purpose of euthanasia. The
district cannot handle stallions, and it retains the right of refusal
for any unsound or dangerous horse horse.
The details of this proposed owner-release horse program will be
presented for public consideration at 6 p.m., Feb. 5, at the
state/county building, 155 E. Main, in the north conference room.
mbernard@vernal.com

 

 
Vermont:

Animal Legislation:

Vermont

Laura Allen has a new article on VT regarding a bill that passed the senate yesterday.

They took up the bill to create a Livestock Advisory Council but tacked on an amendment that added strong penalties for violations of the humane slaughter laws and would require streaming video after one violation in all livestock handling areas and permanent revocation of the license after 2 violations - plus fines. Read the full article below.

http://www.animallawcoalition.com/farm-animals/article/1274

 

 
Virginia:

Virginia

Senate Bill 610

Hi everyone,

This email is just Unbelievable.  There is a bill before the Senate Ag Committee next Thursday which would reclassify Hunting Dogs, Working Dogs and Show Dogs as Agricultural Animals -- thereby taking away the protections of the law for companion animals for these dogs. 

Since you all are in the business of dogs -- Please spread the word to get people to contact their legislators -- tell them that these dogs deserve the same protection of the law and this is not acceptable. The Committee taking up this bill is meeting on Thursday -- make sure your voice is heard. 

http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?121+ful+SB610 

Please forward to anyone you know with an interest.

Susanne 

 

VA, new bill will take all protections from livestock unless it's st

Posted by: "nancii44889" njfoster@centurytel.net   nancii44889

Sat Mar 5, 2011 6:21 pm (PST)
This bill will allow the starvation and dehydration of horses in VA as well as other livestock if it's signed by the governor. Please write, tell the governor not to sign this, or virginia will be hell for horses.
And pass the info on please.
Tell Va Governor to Veto Cruel Farm Animal Bills
VA SB 1026 and HB 1541 Would Legalize Total Cruelty to Farm Animals. Don't Let
This Happen! The Gov. has not yet acted. Call, email, fax Gov. McDonnell today!
Contact Governor McDonnell ASAP through his website at:
http://www.governor.virginia.gov/AboutTheGovernor/contactGovernor.cfm.
Phone: (804) 786-2211. Fax: (804) 371-6351
Quick Background : Two bills were quietly pushed through the Virginia General Assembly and sent to Gov. Robert McDonnell for his signature. If enacted, the proposed legislation will effectively relieve farm animal owners (farmers and corporations) of all humane care obligations. It will be legal for owners to deprive their animals of food and water right up the point of "emaciation" and "dehydration." Farm animal owners will be exempt from providing shelter for their animals in bad weather ("an act of God") and will be legally permitted to hurt and neglect farm animals so long as the abuse is a "customary" farming practice. A Senate amendment that would have allowed for prosecution of a person for "depriving an agricultural animal of necessary food, drink, shelter or emergency veterinary treatment" was REJECTED!
At this writing, SB 1026 and HB 1541 are sitting on Gov. McDonnell's desk for his signature. HELP STOP THAT SIGNATURE! Urge Gov. to VETO SB 1026 & HB 1541.
Note: On February 6, 2011, Virginia resident Marianne Roberts published a letter in The Daily Progress, "Bill weakens animal cruelty law," and on February 7 The Daily Progress published an editorial, "Bill starves protections for animals." These can be read at
http://www2.dailyprogress.com/news/2011/feb/07/bill-starves-protections-animals-ar-824684/
and
http://www2.dailyprogress.com/news/2011/feb/06/bill-weakens-animal-cruelty-law-ar-824697/.

 

(Note from Brandi:  this is a forward I received, so I don’t know the author or much about the bill yet.)

 SB 1026 is a bad bill for Virginia horse!

Virginia's animal cruelty laws rank as one of the best nationwide, but if SB 1016 is enacted it would weaken the existing anti cruelty law.

Here are some reason why this bill is bad for Virginia horses.

The current Virginia law requires ALL animals have adequate space, shelter, food, water and vet care. Under this new law it carves out less protection for horses and requires only the bare minimum of care. It states that owners would only be required to prevent "malnourishment" or dehydration". From a legal perspective these words are way to broad & need to be outline better like in the current law.

In this new law it has the potential to lose legal protection for horses from violent animal abuse. And it is well documented that animal abuse is often the first sign of violent crimes against humans.

Likewise in the new law, a maximum penalty of $250 is a weak deterrence for animal abuse and the new law does not outline if this is per violation or for each animal.

Under the new law, an owner would not have to seek vet care of a sick or injured horse. That means they could leave a horse to die in a field from infection or broken limp.

Finally definitions like "farming activities' are not well defined as such and cruel practices could be justified as a standard farming activity.

In this new law it would make it almost impossible to rescue horses from abuse and neglect.

The Senate committee hearing on S.B. 1026 is this Monday, Jan. 31, at 9:00 a.m. in Senate Room B in the General Assembly Building. This is a critical hearing. If we don't stop the bill here, it could be on the governor's desk within a week. We need as many people at Monday's hearing as possible, and if you're willing to testify, that would be great. We're very outnumbered on this. Letter, emails & phone calls to your Virginia State senator are also needed before Monday.

 

STOP NEW BILL IN VIRGINIA that would allow Horses to be Starved and DeHydrated « The Persian Horse's

wp.me

Virginia Delegate Robert Orrock has introduced H.B. 1541, a bill that, in effect, weakens requirements for the care and treatment of equines and farm animals.

http://thepersianhorse.wordpress.com/2011/01/14/stop-new-bill-in-virginia-that-would-allow-horses-to-be-starved-and-dehydrated/

 

A MUST READ & XPOST FOR ALL RESCUES & SHELTERS

FOR ALL CREATURES GREAT & SMALL

possible end to animal rescue in VA

THIS WILL SET A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT

& COULD HAPPEN

TO YOU OR YOUR FAVORITE RESCUE

&  IMPACT ALL SHELTERS & RESCUE EFFORTS

The zoning officials in Arlington and Fairfax Counties have cited

AFH (A Forever Home Rescue Foundation) volunteers

www.aforeverhome.org/

for keeping foster dogs in their homes.!!!!

Please act NOW unless you want rescue to disappear. 

from: pawsforthecause@hotmail.com

This is one of the most important emails I have written in 15 years of animal rescue.   

Please bear with me.  This email will be a bit long.  You all know that I only use the word 'Urgent' in extreme circumstances.  This is urgent.  It is crucial that you read this email carefully, understand it fully, and respond appropriately.  This issue impacts whether you will be able to keep your rescue open. 

Right now, this issue has a potential to impact ALL rescue groups and shelters in Fairfax County and Arlington County, VA.  Should we lose the battle, it could impact not only every rescue and shelter in VA (and possibly nationwide at some point), but it could also impact other charitable organizations such as the Girl Scouts.  It could shut all of them down, or seriously (and negatively) impact their operations. 

AFH stays current on issues that may impact our organization (and those of our colleagues) and we want to share the following information with you. 

You are encouraged to forward it widely, including any media outlets in your area, and you will be asked at the end of this email to contact the appropriate authorities.   

First, an introduction from Ken Cline - A Forever Home Rescue Foundation (AFH) Board of Directors. 

The zoning officials in Arlington and Fairfax Counties have cited AFH volunteers for keeping foster dogs in their homes. The citations do not claim that there are too many dogs, or that the volunteers don't have a right to keep dogs - repeat - there is no violation regarding too many dogs or a lack of care - we have NOT done anything wrong. The claim is that, since the dogs are associated with a rescue group, they are considered to be “for commercial purposes”. Commercial uses are prohibited in residential districts. If the dogs were not rescue dogs, there would be no problem.  This is our issue - foster homes - ours and yours - could conceivably be shut down for good if we are considered a 'commercial' operation.

The fallacy in this logic is that the fosters are volunteering their homes and their time to house these dogs. There is no compensation provided by the rescue to the foster (foster homes are NOT paid). The fosters are performing a volunteer activity for their “own personal use and enjoyment”. If the Counties are successful in classifying these volunteer activities as commercial in nature, then they will be establishing a precedent that can be used against any foster provider in the County, and potentially in the state. Since most, if not all, rescue groups rely on foster homes to house their animals, that could effectively put rescue in Virginia out of business.

By extension, if they are successful in classifying this type of volunteer activity as commercial – where does the boundary lie? The Girl Scouts rely on volunteers to staff their Girl Scout Troops and to sell their cookies. Is that really any different? It is a volunteer service provided to a non-profit organization – exactly what Arlington and Fairfax are trying to classify as “commercial”.

We cannot allow these citations to stand.

 It is imperative that we win the appeals associated with these cases.

What you should do NOW

Read the attached press release, understand it, forward it to friends, family, the media, and any other interested parties immediately, and then contact everyone on the list below with your opinion.  Post it on your websites.  Put it in your newsletters.  GET THE WORD OUT.  If you don't, there is a very real possibility that rescue in Virginia will be eliminated.  I am not exaggerating this point - this is SERIOUS.  Contact everyone regardless of where you live.  Remember - your county could be next.

PLEASE - be polite and professional but FIRM.

I will copy all of the email addresses to the bottom of this email so you can cut and paste it into your email and send one email to everyone on the list.

Some points to include in your email:

1.  You support rescue - tell them why

2.  Foster homes are NOT commercial.  Neither the foster nor the rescue profits.

3.  If rescue is stopped, tens of thousands more animals will die every year.

4.  If rescue is stopped, it will cost the County/State thousands and thousands of dollars (because rescue saves them money by taking animals they would otherwise kill - which costs taxpayers $$)

5.  If the people you are contacting are elected officials - you will not vote for them again.

6.  If rescue is stopped, you will limit your spending in those counties as much as possible.

7.  The rural shelters that we help will suffer even more since they have so much less than we do now. If we couldn't help them, a 100% kill rate in their shelters is possible.

8.  If you are not a rescuer (just an animal lover), this impacts you too - write to these people about how you would feel about rescue going away and tens of thousands of additional animals dying every year.

You guys are all good at this - you have the facts.  Use your heart to write the rest.

Contacts:

Arlington County:

Arlington County Board of Supervisors:    countyboard@arlingtonva.us

J. Walter Tejada/Chairman                      wtejada@arlingtonva.us

Barbara Favola, Member/ViceChair           bfavola@arlingtonva.us

Jay Fisette, Member                                jfisette@arlingtonva.us

Mary Hynes, Member                                mhynes@arlingtonva.us

Christopher Zimmerman/Member               czimmerman@arlingtonva.us

 Arlington Zoning Administrator                   Melinda Artman martman@arlingtonva.us  

Fairfax County:

Fairfax County Board of Supervisors         http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/opa/aboutbos.htm:

Gerald E. Connolly/Chair                       chairman@fairfaxcounty.gov

Sharon Bulova/ViceChair                       braddock@fairfaxcounty.gov 

John W. Foust/Dranesville Dist.             dranesville@fairfaxcounty.gov

Michael R. Frey/Sully Dist.                    sully@fairfaxcounty.gov

Penelope A. Gross/Mason Dist.                mason@fairfaxcounty.gov

(Mr.) Pat Herrity/Springfield Dist.             springfield@fairfaxcounty.gov

Catherine M. Hudgins/Hunter Mill Dist. hntrmill@fairfaxcounty.gov

Gerald W. Hyland/Mt. Vernon Dist.         mtvernon@fairfaxcounty.gov 

Jeff C. McKay/Lee District                            leedist@fairfaxcounty.gov

Linda Q. Smyth/Providence Dist.               provdist@fairfaxcounty.gov 

Fairfax Zoning Administrator                               Eileen M. McLane eileen.mclane@fairfaxcounty.gov 

General Assembly:

                Senate – Fairfax County

                George L. Barker                                              district39@sov.state.va.us

                Ken Cuccinelli                                                    district37@sov.state.va.us

                Mark R. Herring                                                district33@sov.state.va.us

                Janet Howell                                                      district32@sov.state.va.us

                Chap Petersen                                                  district34@sov.state.va.us

                Toddy Puller                                                       district36@sov.state.va.us

                Richard L. Saslaw                                              district35@sov.state.va.us

 

                House of Delegates – Fairfax County

                David B. Albo                                                     DelDAlbo@house.state.va.us

                Kristen J. Amundson                                      DelKAmundson@house.state.va.us

                David L. Bulova                                  DelDBulova@house.state.va.us

                C. Charles Caputo                                            DelCCaputo@house.state.va.us

                Adam P. Ebbin                                                   DelAEbbin@house.state.va.us

                Timothy D. Hugo                                              DelTHugo@house.state.va.us

                Robert D. Hull                                                    DelRHull@house.state.va.us

                David W. Marsden                                           DelDMarsden@house.state.va.us

                Brian J. Moran                                                   DelBMoran@house.state.va.us

                Kenneth R. Plum                                              DelKPlum@house.state.va.us

                Thomas D. Rust                                                 DelTRust@house.state.va.us

                James M. Scott                                                 DelJScott@house.state.va.us

                Stephen C. Shannon                                       DelSShannon@house.state.va.us

                Mark D. Sickles                                                  DelMSickles@house.state.va.us

                Margaret G. Vanderhye                                                DelMVanderhye@house.state.va.us

                Vivian E. Watts                                                  DelVWatts@house.state.va.us

                Senate – Arlington County

            Patricia S. Ticer                                                district30@sov.state.va.us

                        also covers part of Fairfax County

            Mary Margaret Whipple                                   district31@sov.state.va.us

                        also covers part of Fairfax County

 

            House of Delegates – Arlington County

            Robert H. Brink                                               DelRBrink@house.state.va.us

            Albert C. Eisenberg                              DelAEisenberg@house.state.va.us

            David L. Englin                                               DelDEnglin@house.state.va.us

Email list:

countyboard@arlingtonva.us. wtejada@arlingtonva.us, bfavola@arlingtonva.us, jfisette@arlingtonva.us, mhynes@arlingtonva.us, czimmerman@arlingtonva.us, martman@arlingtonva.us, chairman@fairfaxcounty.gov, braddock@fairfaxcounty.gov, dranesville@fairfaxcounty.gov, sully@fairfaxcounty.gov, mason@fairfaxcounty.gov, springfield@fairfaxcounty.gov, hntrmill@fairfaxcounty.gov, mtvernon@fairfaxcounty.gov, leedist@fairfaxcounty.gov, provdist@fairfaxcounty.gov, eilleen.mclane@fairfaxcounty.gov, district39@sov.state.va.us, district37@sov.state.va.us, district33@sov.state.va.us, district32@sov.state.va.us, district34@sov.state.va.us, district36@sov.state.va.us, district35@sov.state.va.us, DelDAlbo@house.state.va.us, DelKAmundson@house.state.va.us, DelDBulova@house.state.va.us, DelCCaputo@house.state.va.us, DelAEbbin@house.state.va.us, DelTHugo@house.state.va.us, DelRHull@house.state.va.us, DelDMarsden@house.state.va.us, DelBMoran@house.state.va.us, DelKPlum@house.state.va.us, DelTRust@house.state.va.us, DelJScott@house.state.va.us, DelSShannon@house.state.va.us, DelMSickles@house.state.va.us, DelMVanderhye@house.state.va.us, DelVWatts@house.state.va.us, district30@sov.state.va.us, district31@sov.state.va.us, DelRBrink@house.state.va.us, DelAEisenberg@house.state.va.us, DelDEnglin@house.state.va.us

Also visit:  http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/opa/aboutbos.htm:

Please act NOW unless you want rescue to disappear. 
Patti Stinson
Volunteer, www.aforeverhome.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/maarr
Founder (inactive), 4 Paws Rescue Team
www.fourpaws.org

pattistinson13@aol.com

 

 
West Virginia:

The bill, SB 540, would require rescue operators in that state to obtain a license from the state Department of Agriculture. Licensure would be contingent on inspection of both the facility and the horses located at the rescue. Licensed rescue operators would then be subject to subsequent inspections that would take place at least twice a year. County animal welfare or law enforcement personnel would carry out inspections according to guidelines developed by the West Virginia Livestock Care and Standards Board.

Whole article here: (HMER is mentioned in this article as well)

http://www.thehorse.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=17876

 

 
Wisconsin:

Our Wisconsin Friends need our help:

Please using the 6 names listed below-contact these legislators and ask them to co-sponsor LRB 3662 -to strengthen animal cruelty laws in their state.All states may contact these 6 legislators in support!Please take a few minutes to help.Windchill's story (read below) is similar to an experience we have all heard or seen.Let's make his legacy one that will save many lives. 

I'm Kathi Tucker from the WindChill Legacy,Ltd.  I'm doing a follow up email to the letter you received asking for your support to strengthen the animal abuse laws in WI.  Hopefully you had a chance to read the letter or go to our website to look at the actual Bill Draft.  If you have any questions I could answer please let me know kat.raindance@gmail.com
This Bill needs co-sponsorship in order to pass and we are asking if you can call your legislators and ask them to co sponsor LRB 3662. 
The bill draft is on www.WindChillLegacy.org website and I have attached a copy of the legislators by district along with their emails and phone numbers.
It would be great if you would contact your (meambers or colleagues) and ask them to phone their legislators immediately, requesting them to co-sponsor LRB 3662.  We urge you to also ask as many other WI  residents as possible to phone their legislators as well.  It is only open for co-sponsorship through Wednesday, February 3. 
We asked Rep. Milroy to introduce this legislation because of Windchill, a nine month colt that made national news two years ago when our group's founders rescued him.  The colt was found malnourished, covered in ice and snow, unable to stand and near death.  He did not have access to food, water, or shelter with the wind chill range that day between 40 and 55 degrees below zero.  Although we made every effort to save him, he died 20 days later.  The couple boarding the colt for his owner was charged with animal negligence, but received a slap on the wrist for their negligence. You can read the bill on our website www.thewindchilllegacy.org as well as learn more about WindChill and our non-profit organization.
We are also asking everyone to make phone calls to the members of the Legislative Criminal Justice Committee because this is the committee working on the bill.  They are as follows:
Robert Turner Rep.turner@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-0731
Frederick Kessler Rep.kessler@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-5813
Tony Staskunas Rep.staskunas@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-0620
Ann    Hraychuck Rep.Hraychuck@legis.wisconsin.gov(608) 267-2365 
James Soletski Rep.Soletski@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-0485 
Sandy Pasch Rep.Pasch@legis.wisconsin.gov (608) 266-7671
Thank you very much for your help and support in ending animal abuse and neglect!
--
Kathi Tucker
Executive Director
The WindChill Legacy, Ltd.
The moment that you stop being an advocate for your horse(s) is the precise moment when you should not be the one responsible for them.

 

 
Wyoming:

Wyoming passes slaughter bill :(

Posted by: "Donna" MyGirlHello@msn.com   hello13787

Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:54 pm (PST)
Wyoming Governor signs landmark legislation providing the option of horse processing to deal with abandoned horses
The United Organizations of the Horse is working with Dr. Temple Grandin to implement an Equine Assurance Program to ensure meat quality and address animal welfare concerns
CHEYENNE - Wyoming Governor Dave Freudenthal has signed HB 122-Disposal of livestock into law which provides the Wyoming Board of Livestock three options to deal with abandoned, estray (animals whose ownership cannot be determined), feral, or abused animals which come under their control. The first option is taking the animal to a public sale, which was the only alternative before passage of this legislation. Additional options provided are sending the animal to slaughter, or destroying the animal.
While the legislation applies to all classes of livestock, the need arose because of the current lack of a market for low-end horses that are small or are in poor condition. Since the closure of the last US horse slaughter plant in 2007, the only unusable horses that have any value whatsoever are those that are big enough, or healthy enough, to be worth the transportation costs to Canada or Mexico. This has resulted in a huge increase in abandoned and neglected horse cases in Wyoming, and across the nation. Wyoming has seen more than a tripling every year in these numbers, which has required emergency funding through the Governor since they are unable to recoup the cost of care and feeding by selling the horses.
If the Board of Livestock chooses the slaughter option they are required to provide the meat to Wyoming state institutions or nonprofit organizations at their cost. They are authorized to sell the meat to profit entities at market price. Meat intended for human use will be state inspected and used in Wyoming.
The United Organizations of the Horse is coordinating a working group that includes state agencies, private meat processing businesses, nonprofit relief organizations, Dr. Temple Grandin, veterinarians, and other experts to design a system for the processing of horses, and the efficient and practical use of valuable meat and byproducts. The product of this working group will be a pilot Equine Assurance Program which will be a model for other states to utilize to address animal welfare concerns, and ensure the humane handling, transportation, and processing of horses.
Historical photo from Seattle's Pike Place Market that reminds us that horse meat was appreciated nation-wide during World War II as a delicious, healthy and high-quality meat that is 50% higher in protein, 40% lower in fat than beef.
....
Horses for Humanity
The United Organizations will provide horse meat at their cost to Wyoming relief organizations for distribution to those in need. Once the roadblocks to federal inspection of horsemeat in the US can be lifted, the United Organizations of the Horse is planning to implement a partnership with national and international relief organizations to provide wholesome, healthy, humanely harvested horsemeat to the hungry.
Through this program horse owners have the option of donating a horse that would otherwise be disposed of. Owners are assured a quick, humane death for their animal, and the comfort of knowing that the meat is going to a good and useful purpose.
For additional information, please contact Sue Wallis or visit www.UnitedOrgsoftheHorse.org.
###
~~~Donna~~~
http://hello.critters.com
www.youknowmyname25.4t.com
www.newenglandequinerescues.com
"I believe life is magical. It is so precious.
And there are so many kinds of life in this life; so many things to love.
This is my love. It is mine,
And it fills me and it defines me, and it compels me on."

 

===========================================================
BACKGROUND + FEDERAL & STATE ACTIONS TO TAKE
===========================================================
Those in favor of horse slaughter for human consumption claim U.S. slaughter
plants are better regulated than kill floors in Mexico and Canada. Opponents
of a horse slaughter ban contend abandonment/starvation of horses (because
caretakers can't finance their care) is far worse than slaughter. This line
of reasoning overlooks:
-   Americans don't eat horsemeat and the majority oppose killing horses for meat.
-   Horses aren't bred for meat and thus not checked for disease, pathogens prior to slaughter.
-   Animal abandonment is illegal. Offenders should be charged, not permitted to profit from killing horses.
-   Cow and pig slaughter methods used on horses are inhumane for these long-necked animals.
There are too many horses due to overbreeding in industries such as Premarin
and Prempro (HRT drugs from mare's urine); carriage horses; riding stables,
etc. Rather than study feasibility of new slaughterhouses, proponents ought
to question: “Why are so many animals sent to slaughter, starved or abandoned
by owners who refuse to take responsibility for their horses' humane care?"
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
State Bills Related To Horse Slaughter
To read a state bill, go here:
http://www.navs.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=-1&page=NewsArticle&id=7757
SUPPORT New Jersey A551: Referred to Assembly Agriculture & Natural
Resources Committee 1-8. Bans horse slaughter; horseflesh for consumption.
SUPPORT New York A3736: Referred to Committee on Agriculture 1-28. Prohibits
slaughter of horses for human consumption.
SUPPORT Arkansas SCR 11: Read twice by Senate and referred to Senate
Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Economic Development 3-5 Urges horse
owners to take responsibility for the humane treatment and care of horses
during this time of economic crisis.
OPPOSE Arizona SCM 1001: Senate first reading 1-29. Urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Arkansas HCR 1004: Passed House 1-29, read twice by Senate and
referred to Senate Committee on Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development
1-29. Requests congressional support of horse processing facilities.
OPPOSE Idaho HJM5: 3rd reading in House 3-12. Urges Congress to oppose
federal legislation that interferes with a state's ability to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HB 583: Placed on House calendar for second reading and
short debate 2-25. Repeals the state ban on the slaughter of horses.
OPPOSE Illinois HR 160: In House, referred to Rules Committee 3-10. Urges
Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses and
the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Iowa SR 16: Resolution filed, referred to Rules & Administration 3-9.
Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation to ban the slaughter of horses
and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Kansas HCR 5004: Adopted as amended by Agriculture and Natural
Resources 2-17. Resolution urges US Congress to oppose federal legislation
to ban the slaughter of horses and the transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota SF 133: Senate refers to Agriculture and Veterans 1-22.
Resolution urging Congress to oppose federal legislation banning the
slaughter of horses and the transport of horses to slaughter.
OPPOSE Minnesota HF 840: House first reading, referred to Agriculture, Rural
Economies & Veteran Affairs 2-16. Resolution urges Congress to oppose
a federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri HCR 19: House pass 3-11. Urges Congress to oppose a federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Missouri SCR 8: Reported to House 3-5. Urges Congress to oppose a
federal ban on horse slaughter and transport of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Montana HB 418: Passed 2-18, now in Senate, hearing 3-5. Authorizes
investor owned horse slaughter plants.
OPPOSE North Dakota SCR 4021: Passed Senate. Urges Congress to recognize the
need for regulated horse processing facilities in the United States.
OPPOSE North Dakota HB 1496: Introduced 1-19, passed 2-18. Lets Department
of Commerce conduct equine processing facility feasibility study.
OPPOSE South Carolina SCR 480: Senate referred to Committee on Agriculture
and Natural Resources 2-25. Urges Congress to oppose federal legislation
interfering with a state's ability to direct transport/processing of horses.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 2: Senate adopted 2-3-09, House of Representatives
Concurred in Resolution, Passed 2-5-09. Urges reinstatement and funding of a
federal inspection program for horse slaughter and euthanasia facilities.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 4: Passed Senate 2-19, passed House 2-23. Supports
transport of horses out of the state and country.
OPPOSE South Dakota SCR 10: Senate Adopt Resolution, Passed 3-10. Supports
efforts in other states to address need for equine slaughter/processing in U.S
OPPOSE South Dakota SB 114: Senate appropriations deferred, passed 2-5.
Provides for study of feasibility of horse slaughter plant in South Dakota.
OPPOSE Tennessee HB 1361: Referred to Agriculture 2-19. Eliminates packaging
and labeling requirements for horsemeat.
OPPOSE Utah HJR 7: Passed House. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation to ban horse slaughter and the export of horses for slaughter.
OPPOSE Wyoming HJR 8: Signed into law. Urges Congress to oppose federal
legislation that would interfere with a state's authority to direct the
transport or processing of horses.
=============================================================
CONTACT INFORMATION
=============================================================
1. Below is a sample letter about the FEDERAL (NATIONAL) Prevention of
Equine Cruelty Act of 2009 (H.R. 503). You may use letter as written to send
to your Representative and Senators in Congress, in Washington D.C.
2. There are also many STATE BILLS to facilitate horse slaughter. Take a
minute to see if YOUR STATE is listed above. Modify the sample letter to
include the name of the state bill and your argument against it.
--  You have CONGRESSIONAL officials who represent you in Washington DC.
     These are your FEDERAL LEGISLATORS.
--  You also have STATE officials who represent you in your state's capitol.
     These are your STATE LEGISLATORS.
FIND CONTACT INFORMATION FOR YOUR FEDERAL & STATE LEGISLATORS HERE:
*    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/?lvl=L
*    http://www.votesmart.org/

 

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:53 pm (PDT)

Update on State Slaughter Resolutions; Idaho Joins Debate
by: Pat Raia
March 12 2009, Article # 13765
Print Email NEW! Add to Favorites RSS ShareThis
Idaho has joined the list of states pondering legislation aimed at maintaining control of equine transport and re-establishing the horse processing industry in the United States.
Introduced into Idaho's House State Affairs Committee this week by State Rep. Thomas F. Loertscher, HJM 005 instructs Idaho's congressional delegation to vote against the Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503). The federal measure would impose a nationwide ban on the transport of horses for slaughter.
Resolutions similar to Idaho's have passed in:
a.. Kansas (HCR 5004)
b.. South Dakota (SCR 2)
c.. Utah (HJR 7)
d.. Wyoming (HJR 8)
Similar resolutions are pending in:
a.. Arizona (SCM 1001)
b.. Minnesota (SF 133)
c.. North Dakota (HB 1496)
d.. Arkansas (HCR 1004)
e.. Missouri (House, HCR 19; Senate, SCR 8)
Meanwhile, legislators in the following states are considering bills that would amend current state laws to promote the development of horse slaughter plants by private investors:
a.. Illinois (HB 0583)
b.. Montana (HB 418)
c.. Tennessee (HB 1361)
Read more about these bills.
The bills are the first to establish horse processing facilities in the United States since 2007, when lawmakers in Texas and in Illinois shuttered slaughter plants in those states. Horses are currently shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for markets in Europe and Asia.
Keep an eye on TheHorse.com for updates as this situation develops.
Click here to contact your Senator. Click here to contact your Representative.

 

States Ask to Retain Control of Equine Transport, Slaughter

Posted by: "Marge" redmm97@cox.net   redmm97

Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:13 pm (PST)

States Ask to Retain Control of Equine Transport, Slaughter
by: Pat Raia
February 12 2009, Article # 13609
Lawmakers in two Western states have sponsored resolutions urging Congress to let state legislators make up their own minds about horse slaughter issues within their lines. Wyoming's House Joint Resolution (HJR 8) and Utah's House Joint Resolution (HJR 7) both argue the federal Conyers-Burton Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act (HR 503) interferes with states' rights to pursue private sector development of horse slaughter processing plants.
Introduced in January, 2009, by U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich) and Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.), HR 503 prohibits the transport, sale, delivery, or export of American horses for slaughter for human consumption. It also criminalizes the purchase, sale, delivery, or export of horsemeat intended for human consumption. The bill remains in committee.
"We can handle (these issues) as a state better than the feds can," said Utah State Rep. Bradley Winn, a sponsor of the resolution. "With this resolution, we're just telling our representatives in Washington how to vote."
Wyoming and Utah are among four states considering legislation promoting horse processing plant development. North Dakota legislators are seeking state funding for a plant development feasibility study, and a Montana bill would change state law to accommodate prospective processing plant investors. (Read more.)
In 2007 state actions brought about the closure of processing plants in Texas and Illinois that were the only facilities in the United States processing horsemeat for human consumption. Currently, horses are shipped to facilities in Mexico and Canada for processing for human consumption in Europe and Asia.

 

Search for:

 
Dedicated to the equine rescues who save horses every day.
 
Do you have something you would like added to this page?
Email me at:
 
 
Please visit our other sites also!